MHB How to Solve Exponential Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexeia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the exponential equation $$2^x + 2^{x+2} = -5y + 20$$. Participants clarify that the first step involves expressing $$2^x$$ in terms of $$y$$, using the property of exponents to combine like terms. The second part of the discussion addresses finding the largest integer value of $$y$$ for which the equation has solutions, leading to the conclusion that $$y_{\text{max}}$$ is 3, as the equation requires $$-5y + 20 > 0$$. Finally, the next step is to solve the original equation for $$x$$ when $$y = 3$$. Understanding these steps is crucial for progressing through the problem.
Alexeia
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I attached a pdf with a question and its answers. I don't understand the whole thing basically, e.g what their asking for..

1.2.1;1.2.2;1.2.3

1.2.2 - How many solutions for x will the equation have..?
1.2.3 - Largest integer for which it will have solutions..?

Any explanations will help..

Thanks
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here are the questions:

1.2 Given: $$2^x+2^{x+2}=-5y+20$$

1.2.1 Express $$2^x$$ in terms of $y$.

Here, you are expected to solve the equation for $2^x$. Recall the property of exponents:

$$a^{b+c}=a^ba^c$$

which means:

$$2^{x+2}=2^x2^2=4\cdot2^x$$

So now the equation becomes:

$$2^x+4\cdot2^x=-5y+20$$

Can you continue? Combine the two like terms on the left side as your first step.

After we get this part solved, where you understand it, we can move on to the remaining parts, as they depend on this part.
 
MarkFL said:
Here are the questions:

1.2 Given: $$2^x+2^{x+2}=-5y+20$$

1.2.1 Express $$2^x$$ in terms of $y$.

Here, you are expected to solve the equation for $2^x$. Recall the property of exponents:

$$a^{b+c}=a^ba^c$$

which means:

$$2^{x+2}=2^x2^2=4\cdot2^x$$

So now the equation becomes:

$$2^x+4\cdot2^x=-5y+20$$

Can you continue? Combine the two like terms on the left side as your first step.

After we get this part solved, where you understand it, we can move on to the remaining parts, as they depend on this part.
Awesome, the way the questioned was asked confused me.. Another way of saying it then is - Solve for 2^x.. But it doesn't yet mean to solve for x right?

Then Question 1.2.3, can you shed some light on that one pls?
 
Alexeia said:
Then Question 1.2.3, can you shed some light on that one pls?
1.2 Given:
\[
2^x+2^{x+2}=-5y+20\tag{1}
\]
...
1.2.3: Solve for $x$ if $y$ is the largest possible integer value for which (1) will have solutions.

Question 1.2.3 (admittedly, a bit convoluted) says the following. Let $P(y)$ be some property of $y$ (to be discussed later). Find the largest integer $y$ such that $P(y)$ holds and call it $y_{\text{max}}$. Now solve (1) for $x$ assuming that $y=y_{\text{max}}$.

The property $P(y)$ in question is that (1) has a solution $x$ for a given $y$. Note that the equation
\[
2^x+2^{x+2}=z
\]
has some solution $x$ iff $z>0$. Therefore,
\[
P(y)\text{ holds }\iff -5y+20>0 \iff y<4.
\]
The largest $y_{\text{max}}$ satisfying this property is 3 (since the inequality is strict). Therefore, you are supposed to solve (1) when $y=3$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top