How to Solve for T in an Equilibrium Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ashley1nOnly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
To solve for T in an equilibrium problem, it is essential to isolate T in the equation. Understanding how to find the roots of a polynomial of degree 2 can be crucial in this process. The discussion highlights the importance of seeking guidance when encountering difficulties in solving equations. A collaborative approach can lead to effective solutions that may not be initially considered. Engaging with others can enhance problem-solving skills in complex mathematical scenarios.
Ashley1nOnly
Messages
132
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


upload_2017-11-1_2-23-39.png


Homework Equations


upload_2017-11-1_2-23-56.png

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2017-11-1_2-22-40.png
I'm trying to solve this problem but I can't get the Te by itself. Does anyone have any answers as to a direction I should take?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-1_2-22-40.png
    upload_2017-11-1_2-22-40.png
    44.3 KB · Views: 662
  • upload_2017-11-1_2-23-19.png
    upload_2017-11-1_2-23-19.png
    47.5 KB · Views: 426
  • upload_2017-11-1_2-23-39.png
    upload_2017-11-1_2-23-39.png
    42.3 KB · Views: 547
  • upload_2017-11-1_2-23-56.png
    upload_2017-11-1_2-23-56.png
    40.7 KB · Views: 612
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with how to find the roots of a polynomial of degree 2?
 
I solved it with your help. I didn't even think about doing it that way. Thanks
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

How to find the equilibrium position of three masses (two of them fixed)?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Temperature of two subsystems at equilibrium
Replies
7
Views
903
Can 3 forces of 9N, 4N, and 6N be in equilibrium?
Replies
9
Views
3K
Friction - problem with one of the equilibrium equations
Replies
13
Views
1K
What is the Direction of Normal Force in Static Equilibrium on a Ramp?
Replies
5
Views
1K
To what extent does this system behave as a pendulum?
Replies
1
Views
852
Solving Equilibrium w/ Plank & Forces | Physics Problem
Replies
7
Views
4K
Why Does Torque Equilibrium Not Solve for Fcy in Static Equilibrium Problems?
Replies
9
Views
4K
Rocket Nozzle with combined equilibrium/frozen flow
Replies
1
Views
2K
Equilibrium Position of a Hanging Candy Cane
Replies
17
Views
845

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top