How to solve the equation 3^2x+1 = 3^x + 24, do I need logarithms

  • Thread starter Thread starter repugno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
The equation 3^(2x+1) = 3^x + 24 can be approached using logarithms, but care must be taken with notation and properties of logarithms. Initial attempts to apply logarithms directly led to confusion, particularly with the incorrect assumption that log(a + b) equals log(a) + log(b). A clearer method involves rewriting the equation and substituting t = 3^x, simplifying the problem. Using base 3 for logarithms proved advantageous, allowing for easier manipulation of the equation. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of careful notation and selecting the appropriate logarithmic base for solving exponential equations.
repugno
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Greetings all, I have a slight problem solving this equation ... 3^2x+1 = 3^x + 24

I know I can solve it with logs but I'm just not sure where to begin. I have tried taking logarithms both sides but it didn't work :confused:

Perhaps someone could give me a clue :biggrin:

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show the work you've done so far?

cookiemonster
 
Sure...

3^2x+1 = 3^x + 24

(2x+1)lg3 = xlg3 + lg24

(2x+1)lg3/lg3 = xlg3/lg3 + lg24/lg3

2x+1 = x + 2.89

x = 1.89

This is obviously wrong.
 
Be careful with log (3^x + 24).

In general, log(a + b) does not equal log(a) + log(b).

And you need to be careful with your notation. I first read the problem as 3^(2x) + 1 = 3^x + 24. Those darned parentheses!

cookiemonster
 
32x+1 = 3x + 24

Can you show that 32x+1 = 3*32x? Can you show that 3*(32x) = 3*(3x)2? Now what kind of equation do you get if you let t = 3x?
 
Thank you very much for your help.
 
These logarithms is not my good friend unfortunitaly, it is either that or I'm missing a fundamental point.

log_3x - 2log_x3 = 1

I don't understand how to solve this, I know the rules of logarithms but they don't seem to be much help here. Can anyone help me please.

Thanks
 
You might find this useful

\log_b a = \frac{\ln a}{\ln b}

cookiemonster
 
More generally:

\log_b a = \frac{\log_c a}{\log_c b}

Where c is whatever number you want (cookiemonster chose c = e, resulting in natural logs). For the problem above you might want to pick c = 3.
 
  • #10
It worked ! Thanks for the help yet again. One question though, how did you come to the conclusion that I should take the base as 3?
 
  • #11
You started with this:

log_3x - 2log_x3 = 1

Using ln you would have gotten:

\frac{\ln x}{\ln 3} - 2\frac{\ln 3}{\ln x} = 1

And just get stuck with ln(3). However, using 3 as the base you can get:

\frac{\log_3 x}{\log_3 3} - 2\frac{\log_3 3}{\log_3 x} = 1

And of course log3(3) = 1 and it's much easier to handle:

\log_3 x - \frac{2}{\log_3 x} = 1

Obviously you would still get the same answer with both methods, I just thought it would be slightly easier to solve when using base 3. :smile:
 
Back
Top