How to Solve the Infamous x*sec(x) Integration Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter heman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
The integral of x*sec(x) is notoriously difficult and does not have a simple expression in terms of elementary functions. One suggested approach is to use the Maclaurin series for sec(x) and multiply by x, then integrate term by term for an approximation. Integration by parts was also mentioned, but many users found it ineffective for this particular problem. The discussion highlights the frustration of trying to solve this integral, especially due to a challenge posed by a school teacher. Ultimately, the consensus is that the integral is complex and may require advanced techniques beyond standard methods.
heman
Messages
353
Reaction score
0
i am struggling with this problem for 3 years and still not able to think anything how to integrate it.please. anyone tell me how to integrate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a good reason why you're having trouble with the integral - there is no simple expression for it! :-)
 
Hi ppl,
One suggestion I would make, if the integral is indeed so difficult, is to obtain firstly the maclaurin series for secx, using the binomial expansion of (cosx)^-1 where cosx is also written down as a power series. Then multiply through by x(x*secx) and integrate the x terms one by one to obtain an approximation to this integral. Of course this is only an approximation, yet if all you desire is to work out a definite integral it might prove useful, the indefinite integral is not so straightforward I imagine.
Regards,
Joe
 
Well if you put: x * Sec[x] in to: http://integrals.wolfram.com/ it returns:

x \left( \log \left[ \frac{1 - ie^{ix}}{1 + ie^{ix}} \right] \right) + i \left( \text{polylog} \left[2, -ie^{ix} \right] - \text{polylog} \left[2, ie^{ix} \right] \right)
 
Zurtex said:
Well if you put: x * Sec[x] in to: http://integrals.wolfram.com/ it returns:

x \left( \log \left[ \frac{1 - ie^{ix}}{1 + ie^{ix}} \right] \right) + i \left( \text{polylog} \left[2, -ie^{ix} \right] - \text{polylog} \left[2, ie^{ix} \right] \right)




i could not understand the solution ,how can i solve the question
 
heman said:
i could not understand the solution ,how can i solve the question
What's the question?
 
Zurtex said:
What's the question?





to integrate x*sec(x)
 
Integration by parts, my friend. Here's the formula:

\int (u)(dv) = (uv) - \int (v)(du)

[Pardon the parentheses. I'm new to Tex.]

I'm assuming you know how to do the rest. Integrate, differentiate, complete.
 
Last edited:
phreak said:
Integration by parts, my friend. Here's the formula:

\int (u)(dv) = (uv) - \int (v)(du)

[Pardon the parentheses. I'm new to Tex.]

I'm assuming you know how to do the rest. Integrate, differentiate, complete.


dear phreak i have tried integration by parts so many times,but nothing is solved.actually,i think some advanced theorem is involved in it.
 
  • #10
Quite simply this integration seems to be beyond your ability as well as beyond mine. I had a quick look around to try and explain this better. But the best I can do is say if you differentiate this with respect to x:

-x \text{arctanh} \left( ie^{-x} \right) + i \left( \text{polylog} \left[2, -ie^{ix} \right] - \text{polylog} \left[2, ie^{ix} \right] \right)

You get x \sec x.

If it is of any help:

\text{polylog} (n,z) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{z^k}{k^n}

So:

\text{polylog} (2,z) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{z^k}{k^2}

Furthermore:

\frac{d}{dx} \left( \text{polylog} (n,x) \right) = \frac{1}{x} \text{polylog}(n-1,x)

And:

\text{polylog} (1,x) = -\ln (1-x)

Best I can do sorry.
 
  • #11
please any guru of integration tell me the pathway to this solution.i will be highly thankful.
 
  • #12
How about paying attention to what people HAVE been telling you :
Tide said:
There's a good reason why you're having trouble with the integral - there is no simple expression for it! :-)
.

Like the great majority of integrable functions, the integral of x sec(x) cannot be written in terms of elementary functions.
 
  • #13
HallsofIvy said:
How about paying attention to what people HAVE been telling you :
.

Like the great majority of integrable functions, the integral of x sec(x) cannot be written in terms of elementary functions.



actually dear why i am so much worried about these is that my school teacher knows the solution of this problem and he challenged all the guys of school for 2000 bugs and he is sure to pay if anyone brings the soln and if i will come to know, my little finance prob.s will be solved,our school teacher gave it to us when we were in high school.that means that teacher is a fraud becoz he asks such tough questions from studs. of 12th class.i will tell this to him.

even than
thanx for urscoepration and suggesting the pathways.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K