How to Solve This Rotational Motion Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a rotational motion problem involving energy conservation principles. Participants emphasize using work conservation from the moment of release to maximum extension, noting that kinetic energy is maximized at the mean position while potential energy peaks at maximum extension. The equations presented demonstrate the relationship between kinetic energy, rotational inertia, and spring potential energy. A participant confirms the correctness of the calculations and highlights an error in the reference book. The conversation concludes with validation of the solution provided.
coldblood
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,
Please help me in solving this problem, I'll appreciate the help.

The problem is as:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/q71/s720x720/1520824_1461728107387628_750491406_n.jpg

Attempt -

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/q71/s720x720/1459220_1461728404054265_66267352_n.jpg


Thank you all in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to break it into two stages. Just look at work conservation from moment of release to maximum extension.
 
haruspex said:
You don't need to break it into two stages. Just look at work conservation from moment of release to maximum extension.

According to this, K.E. →Max→at mean position (I think it won't be the release point)
and
P.E.→Max→ at ext. position.

1/2. mv2 + 1/2 Iω2 = 1/2. kx2 (since ω= v/r)

=> 1/2. mv2 + 1/2 (1/2.mr2)(v/r)2 = 1/2. kx2
=> 3/4. mv2 = 1/2. kx2
x2 = (3/2)(mv2)/k
Is that correct?
 
coldblood said:
According to this, K.E. →Max→at mean position (I think it won't be the release point)
and
P.E.→Max→ at ext. position.

1/2. mv2 + 1/2 Iω2 = 1/2. kx2 (since ω= v/r)

=> 1/2. mv2 + 1/2 (1/2.mr2)(v/r)2 = 1/2. kx2
=> 3/4. mv2 = 1/2. kx2
x2 = (3/2)(mv2)/k
Is that correct?
It starts at rest, and it will be instantaneously at rest at maximum extension, so there's no KE to consider. There's just the lost gravitational PE and the gained spring PE.
 
haruspex said:
It starts at rest, and it will be instantaneously at rest at maximum extension, so there's no KE to consider. There's just the lost gravitational PE and the gained spring PE.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/1488253_1462165574010548_1361638838_n.jpg
 
coldblood said:
https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/1488253_1462165574010548_1361638838_n.jpg
Well, well. Another error in the book! Your answer is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top