How to test forecasting accuracy of regression model?

dune2
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hey, I have just finished running all the regressions for my thesis and I now have a nice 8-variable regression with an r² if 0.53. Almost all my hypothezised variables are significant. I am now wodering if there is a possibility to somehow test the forecasting accuracy of this model? I am using SPSS, is there anything that comes to mind? I just want to say something like: here is the printout, all is significant. Here is the forecasting equation, coefficients 1 though 8 do blablabla, forcasting accuracy is X. Is that possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you sound like you know more than I do but I know that when you are working with neural networks, you train the network on only part of the data, and you reserve the rest of the data to test the accuracy of the network--to see if the network correctly "predicts the past." Maybe you can see if your model correctly "predicts the past" if you have data available for testing that has not been input into your model.
 
You should first state the value of the "F" statistic for the overall regression.

It is possible to construct a confidence interval for the forecast; you first need to compute the standard error of the forecast. Then (lower bound, upper bound) = (Yhat - SEYhattc, Yhat + SEYhattc) where Yhat is the point forecast, SE is the standard error of Yhat, and tc is the critical t (= approx. 2).

See http://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4365/
 
Last edited:
Ah, thanks!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top