How to use extra term in radial equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter valtorEN
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radial Term
valtorEN
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Due to the modification of inner-shell electrons of a multi-electron system,

the outer shell electron can feel an effective electrostatic potential as

V(r)=-e^2/(4*π*eo*R)-lambda*(e^2/(4*π*eo*R^2)) ; 0<lambda≤1

Find the energy eigenvalues and wavefunctions of the outer shell electron

and compare to those of the hydrogen atom

Homework Equations



Radial equation

-hbar^2/2*m(d^2u/dr^2)+[(V(r)+(hbar^2/2*m)*l(l+1)/R^2]

Eigenenergies for hydrogen atom

En=-[(m/2*hbar^2)*(e^2/4*π*e0)^2]*(1/n^2)=E1/n^2



The Attempt at a Solution



i plugged the effective potential into the radial equation, divided by E

(E=-hbar^2*k^2/(2*m)) where k=sqrt(2mE)/hbar

and get an equation with the same general solutions as in my book

u(rho)=(rho^(l+1))*(e^(-rho))*(v(rho))

still, how does this term effect the energy compared to that with hydrogen's

eigenenergies? i assume a const term with lambda in it finds it way into the

eigenenergies, but how to solve this is beyond me!


how do i calculate the new energy eigenvalues and wave functions?

how do they compare to that of hydrogen?

cheers
nate
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My feeling is that you could rescale the r-axis to get this problem solved.
The additional term in the potential is similar to the angular momentum term.
Therefore, the effect should be equivalent to the same problem with r rescaled and V(r) rescaled correspondingly.
But that is only my guess ...
Hope it helps.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top