How to Write Down w* in Polar Form for a Given Complex Number?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing the complex number w in polar form, specifically focusing on its complex conjugate w*. The original poster presents w as 2<-(pi/3) and expresses difficulty in working with this notation compared to Cartesian form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the meaning of the "<" symbol in the context of polar representation and the notation for the complex conjugate. There is an attempt to clarify the assumptions regarding the modulus and argument of the complex number.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with some participants providing insights into the relationship between Cartesian and polar forms of complex numbers. There is an exploration of the implications of the notation used, but no consensus has been reached regarding the original poster's question.

Contextual Notes

Ambiguities in notation, such as the meaning of "<" and the asterisk for the complex conjugate, are noted. The original poster's familiarity with Cartesian form but not polar form is also highlighted.

andrey21
Messages
475
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi guys I have been given a question, write down w* in polar form where w=2< -(pi/3). I can work out the question when it is in cartesian form just not this way, any help woud be great.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does "<" mean??
 
Not entirely sure that's just the way it is shown in the question. All i know is when i converted it to cartesian form it became 1 - SQRT3 i
 
You have left two things ambiguous. As arilno implied "<" is not a standard notation but I am going to assume that you meant the complex number is written in the polar form with modulus r= 3 and angle, or "argument", [itex]\theta= \pi/3[/itex].

The other thing that is ambiguous is the *. I am going to assume that you mean "complex conjugate" which is more commonly written [itex]\overline{w}[/itex].

The connection between "Cartesian representation" and "polar representation" is [itex]z= x+ iy= r (cos(\theta)+ i sin(\theta))[/itex] or, equivalently, [itex]z=x+ iy= r e^{i\theta}[/itex] The complex conjugate is gotten, basically, by changing the sign on "i":
[itex]\overline{z}= x- iy= r (cos(\theta)- i sin(\theta))[/itex] which, because cosine is an even function and sine is an odd function, can be written [itex]\overline{z}= x- iy= r (cos(\theta)- i sin(\theta))[/itex][itex]= cos(-\theta)+ i sin(\theta)[/itex].

Similarly, from [itex]z= x+ iy= r e^{i\theta}[/itex], [itex]\overline{z}= x- iy= r e^{-i\theta}[/itex].

In either case, the complex number given by modulus r and argument [itex]\theta[/itex] has complex conjugate given by modulus r and argument [itex]-\theta[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K