How we are still able to detect CMB photons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CuriousNilave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cmb Photons
CuriousNilave
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This might be a silly question. But recently I got to know about CMB(cosmic microwave background) and this question is nagging me. During CMB , the universe was pretty small compared to now, so our current point of existence in space would have been very near the CMB, 13.7 bill yrs ago. So the photons from the CMB would have passed our point very early itself. Why is it passing our point now? Did the space between our point and CMB points increase faster than speed of light and because of this we are able to see CMB photons now?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The CMB was released everywhere in the Universe. What we see now is simply microwaves from the part of the Universe that is just far away enough for the light from the CMB to take us 13.7 billion years to reach us. At the time of release, this was much closer to us than 13.7 billion light years, but it has taken so long because while the light has been progressing, the distance has grown due to expansion. The distance to those parts of the Universe today is significantly larger than 13.7 billion light years, which makes sense as part of the journey happened when the distance was smaller.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Orodruin. So did the expansion of space happened faster than speed of light during CMB period?
 
CuriousNilave said:
So did the expansion of space happened faster than speed of light during CMB period?
First of all, expansion happens at a rate, not at a velocity. This does mean that some distances will grow faster than the speed of light but this is not due to anything actually moving in relation to something else. Even today distances will grow faster than the speed of light if you go far away enough.

Second, I suggest you read this FAQ: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/at-what-velocity-does-the-universe-expand-can-it-be-faster-than-light.508610/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks a lot.. This is very helpful!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
103
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top