How we compute killing vector for two-sphere

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter off-diagonal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Killing vector Vector
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the computation of Killing vectors for the two-sphere, focusing on the mathematical framework and steps involved in deriving these vectors from the metric. Participants explore the theoretical aspects, calculations, and potential misunderstandings related to the Killing vector equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the metric for the two-sphere and provides three proposed Killing vectors derived from a reference text.
  • Another participant outlines the steps necessary to compute the Killing vectors, including extracting the metric tensor components, calculating the Christoffel symbols, and applying the Killing vector equation.
  • A later reply expresses confusion regarding the calculations and the appearance of terms dependent on the variable \(\phi\), suggesting a possible misunderstanding of the Killing vector equation.
  • Another participant suggests a method for solving the equations derived from the Killing vector equation, emphasizing the importance of integration and the presence of integration constants.
  • There is a mention that the independent Killing vectors can be expressed in terms of the generators of rotations on the sphere.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the calculations or the interpretation of the results. There are indications of confusion and potential errors in the computations, but no agreement on the resolution of these issues is evident.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of the Killing vector equation and the implications of the derived equations. The discussion reflects varying levels of clarity regarding the integration process and the role of integration constants in the calculations.

off-diagonal
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
The metric on S^2 is given by,
\displaystyle ds^2=d\theta^2 + sin^2\theta d\phi^2


Here's the answer

\displaystyle \xi ^{\mu}_{(1)}\partial _{\mu} = \partial_{\phi}

\displaystyle \xi^{\mu}_{(2)}\partial_{\mu} = \ -(cos\phi \partial_{\theta} - cot\theta sin\phi \partial_{\phi})

\displaystyle \xi^{\mu}_{(3)}\partial_{\mu} = sin\phi \partial_{\theta} + cot\theta cos\phi \partial_{\phi}

from Black Hole Physics: Basic Concepts and New Development by Frolov & Novikov
Appendix B

Anyone can explain me how to compute this 3 Killing vector?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll need to pull off the g_{\mu\nu} from the line element and then easily calculate the inverses g^{\mu\nu}. Then you have to calculate the Christoffel symbols from the metric components (looking hard at the equations for these, can you see which symbols will be non-vanishing ahead of time?). Then you know how the covariant derivative acts (See standard equations for GR). Then the Killing vector equation is \nabla_{\mu}\zeta_{\nu} + \nabla_{\nu}\zeta_{\mu}=0. After you've carefully written these things out, you can do some integrals to pull out the Killing vectors from the above equation.
 
javierR said:
You'll need to pull off the g_{\mu\nu} from the line element and then easily calculate the inverses g^{\mu\nu}. Then you have to calculate the Christoffel symbols from the metric components (looking hard at the equations for these, can you see which symbols will be non-vanishing ahead of time?). Then you know how the covariant derivative acts (See standard equations for GR). Then the Killing vector equation is \nabla_{\mu}\zeta_{\nu} + \nabla_{\nu}\zeta_{\mu}=0. After you've carefully written these things out, you can do some integrals to pull out the Killing vectors from the above equation.

Thank you for your answer
but after I perform calculation. I found a problem that may cause from my misunderstand about Killing vector equation.

Here's the detail
from these metric
\displaystyle ds^2=d\theta^2 + sin^2\theta d\phi^2 I can read out metric tensor component as \displaystyle g_{\theta}_{\theta}= 1 g_{\phi}_{\phi}=sin^2\theta
so I can compute Christoffel symbol , there are two component in S^2 case
\displaystyle \Gamma^{\theta}_{\phi\phi}=-sin\theta cos\theta
\displaystyle \Gamma^{\phi}_{\phi \theta}=cot\theta

and from Killing equation I've got three equation

\displaystyle \mu=\nu=\theta
\displaystyle \partial_{\theta}\xi_{\theta}=0 since there are no \displaystyle \Gamma^{i}_{\theta\theta}

\displaystyle \mu=\nu=\phi
\displaystyle \partial_{\phi}\xi_{\phi}+sin\theta cos\theta \xi_{\theta}= 0

\displaystyle \mu=\theta,\nu=\phi
\displaystyle \partial_{\theta}\xi_{\phi}+\partial_{\phi}\xi_{\theta}-2cot\theta \xi_{\phi}= 0

What should I do next? to find all {\xi}
PS. since my answer has a term which depend on\phi but until my last calculation I found no \phi terms appear so am I miscalculate somewhere above?
 
Sorry, I didn't see your message till now. If you still need it: Now you can solve for the \xi_{\mu} by integration for each of the three equations. Try finding the form of the theta one first and then proceed to the next one using that result, and so on. You'll have to do some analysis to get the explicit form of the functions, and don't forget the presence of integration constants (constant with respect to one or both variables that is, since we're dealing with partial derivatives). Once you get the functions for theta and phi, you can easily invert them with the form of the metric you wrote down. Then the independent Killing vectors are \xi^{\theta}\partial_{\theta} and \xi^{\phi}\partial_{\phi}, and a general Killing vector is a linear combination of these. (You can also show that you can write such a Killing vector split into three parts corresponding to generators of rotations on the sphere).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K