How we know that these angles are equal ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samia qureshi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equality of angles formed by lines AP, EP, and BP in a geometric context, particularly under the condition where the distance d between the lines is negligible compared to the length L. Participants explore whether these lines can be treated as parallel, leading to equal angles, and emphasize the mathematical justification for this approximation. The slopes of the lines are analyzed, showing that as d approaches zero relative to L, the gradients become nearly equal, confirming their parallel nature. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding geometric relationships and mathematical proofs in verifying angle equality. Overall, the discussion effectively illustrates the principles of geometry in relation to parallel lines and angle relationships.
Samia qureshi
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/13529050_1033411326734648_2364124398862717743_n.jpg?oh=991ce9f095c712dd7789ce0819be581e&oe=58016FFA&__gda__=1475707536_89e5606d703064d4c1ccd2e87d665c1b

are these alternate interior angle or exterior angle? is it just because of mathematical rule of geometry or what makes these angle equal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are not the same ... the diagram is showing you an approximation.

If L >> d, then the rays AP EP and BP are almost sort of parallel. Now do the geometry.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2, Nidum, Samia qureshi and 1 other person
I was making a version of your diagram when Simon beat me to it..
angle.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Nidum and Samia qureshi
Thank you :smile:
 
I'm always suspicious when I see a woolly question about geometry where the lines on supplied diagram are all labelled but there is no reference to them in the question .

Could it be that the actual question is whether there is any possible relationship between the lengths of the labelled lines which makes the problem angles equal ?

There is certainly one such relationship possible where EP and BP are the same length ie where EP coincides with BP .

For a given angle and one given length the other line lengths could now be determined .
 
Nidum said:
Could it be that the actual question is
Simon's interpretation seems rather more likely.
 
It's certainly recognisable as a drawing associated with diffraction gratings/interference.
 
haruspex said:
Simon's interpretation seems rather more likely.
When L >> d, then AP EP and BP are parallel. What is the reasoning behind this result ? Can it be proven mathematically that the three lines are almost parallel under the approximation L >> d ?
 
Vibhor said:
When L >> d, then AP EP and BP are parallel. What is the reasoning behind this result ? Can it be proven mathematically that the three lines are almost parallel under the approximation L >> d ?
Say the lines have started at A and B and they meet each other at P. L is the distance from the starting point at which they meet. If distance between the lines d is negligible compared to L, they can be treated as two parallel lines. For two actual parallel lines, the distance between them is negligible compared to the distance at which they meet, which is infinity. Hence, their slopes are equal. So, here, the two lines with very small d(in mm) and very large L (in meters) can be approximated as two parallel lines. Their slopes will be almost equal.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
cnh1995 said:
If distance between the lines d is negligible compared to L, they can be treated as two parallel lines.
Why ? This is what I asked in the previous post :smile: . Could you prove it mathematically ?
 
  • #11
Vibhor said:
Why ? This is what I asked in the previous post :smile: . Could you prove it mathematically ?
For the lines with d<<L, the meeting distance L is very high compared to their separation d. For actual parallel lines, the meeting distance is infinity which means it is very very large compared to their separation. So, the lines with d<<L can be practically treated as parallel lines.
Mathematically speaking, their slopes are almost equal. Draw a horizontal line from A and let it cut the screen at point M. If you calculate the slopes of AP and BP, you'll get slope of AP=PM/AM
and slope of BP=(PM+d)/AM. Let's say AM=1m, PM=1m and d=1mm. So, PM≈PM+d. If PM is small, say 10mm, PM/AM≈(PM+d)/AM since AM is in meters and PM and d are in a few mm i.e. 10mm/1m≈11mm/1m. In both the cases, the slopes are almost equal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Vibhor
  • #12
Vibhor said:
Why ? This is what I asked in the previous post :smile: . Could you prove it mathematically ?
From the diagram in the opening post, the gradient of the lines AP and BP are
$$g_{AP}=\frac{y-d/2}{L} = \frac{y}{L}-\frac{d}{2L}$$
$$g_{BP}=\frac{y+d/2}{L}=\frac{y}{L}+\frac{d}{2L}$$
In the limit ##d\ll L##, the second term in each expression for the gradient goes to zero, and we see that the two gradients are equal. Therefore, the lines are parallel.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995 and Vibhor
  • #13
James R said:
From the diagram in the opening post, the gradient of the lines AP and BP are
$$g_{AP}=\frac{y-d/2}{L} = \frac{y}{L}-\frac{d}{2L}$$
$$g_{BP}=\frac{y+d/2}{L}=\frac{y}{L}+\frac{d}{2L}$$
In the limit ##d\ll L##, the second term in each expression for the gradient goes to zero, and we see that the two gradients are equal. Therefore, the lines are parallel.

Very Nice !

Thanks
 
Back
Top