How weight of an object divides into components

  • Thread starter Thread starter fireflies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Components Weight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the forces acting on a uniform rod supported at its midpoint by a peg while inclined at an angle theta. The weight of the rod can be divided into components: mg cos(theta) perpendicular to the rod and mg sin(theta) along the rod. The confusion arises when considering the support point at a location other than the center of gravity, specifically at point D, and how this affects the frictional force and reaction forces. A diagram is suggested as a helpful tool for visualizing these forces and their interactions. Understanding the role of the center of gravity is crucial for accurately measuring forces when the support point changes.
fireflies
Messages
210
Reaction score
12
Let us suppose a rod is inclined on the ground such that its middle point is supported by a peg. It is a uniform rod and the point where it touches the ground is A, mid-point (also the centre of gravity) is C. The rod is inclined at angle theta with
horizon. So, we can divide the components of weight into
mgcos(theta) against the normal of the rod, andg sin (theta) along
the rod. Then how do we measure it if the peg was at any
other point D (I meant measure
the weight at D), which is not the centre of gravity? What are the conditions to support the rod then, when the angle is same? How frictional force is at the point touching the ground?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A diagram helps a lot for these problems.
 
Dr. Courtney said:
A diagram helps a lot for these problems.

Yes, I tried with a diagram.

The actual confusion started when I tried to solve this problem www.physicsforums.com/threads/Newtons-third-law-confusion.825741/

There I got at C the force along the rod is mg cos theta which passes through the point touching ground. At that point I further divided the mg sin theta into components to find the frictional force and reaction force. Then, the question came, why not use weight here. I know the answer, it is because the weight acts along the centre of gravity. Then the question comes, what should I do then if the peg was some point above C, suppose at D? What would it change in frictional force then?

Well, I think the main problem I am having is with centre of gravity. How it works when we consider the other points of the object other than centre of gravity? Maybe the answers of the previous questions may give a clear view to the later ones
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top