I How Would Afshar's Experiment Affect Entanglement?

Erik Ayer
Messages
78
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
If one of the two beams from non-colinear SPDC were sent through Afshar's experiment, would momentum, path, and/or polarization entanglement be broken?
Afshar's experiment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afshar_experiment) sent a light beam through a double-slit to get interference, put wires in the places where there were dark fringes, then refocused the light with a lens get "image" the two slits. I'm wondering what entanglements would break if one beam from an entangled source were sent through Afshar's experiment. To keep this slightly simple, assume the two beams with entangled photons are from type 2 SPDC and are not colinear - they two beams go in different directions.

What I would expect is that momentum entanglement would be broken when the beam went through the slits and diffracted. However, I wonder whether it could be preserved if, instead of slit, the beam were split with a regular old (non-polarizing) beam splitter and the two sub-beams made to overlap and interfere with a lens. My guess would be that path entanglement would survive since a photon going through the left slit would end up in the left image and one going through the right slit would end up in the right image after the lens. Polarization entanglement would survive since Afshar's experiment does nothing to measure or collapse the polarization state of superposition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The dark spots that you'd put the wires in will not be present when the photon is entangled with another photon. You won't be able to find a spot where a detector never clicks. Ignoring that and putting the wires in the usual place would be equivalent to measuring the photon in the "left slit + right slit vs left slit - right slit" basis (or something of that nature), downgrading the entanglement between the two photons into correlation.
 
Thank you for your response! If I understand correctly, the momentum entanglement would be destroyed. I'm not sure about path entanglement of whether it even makes sense to ask about that. However, would polarization entanglement remain intact? It seems like it should.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top