How Would Confirmed Varying Constants Impact Loop Quantum Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sauron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Lqg
Sauron
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Today someone has asked me about the evidences about the variations of fundamental constants (mainly alpha)

As it is known that variation attemps versus the equivalence principle.

So i wonder, if that variation would be irrefutably confirmed how would it affect LQG?

I mean, LQG depends strongly in the equivalence principle. If that is violated from the very first still makes sense to do LQG?

I remeber that Magueijo, on ofthe more active researchers in VSL´s had gone to the perimeter institute soi suspect it can be some workaround to do LQG even if alpha is not a constant. Someone has detaills?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sauron said:
Today someone has asked me about the evidences about the variations of fundamental constants (mainly alpha)

As it is known that variation attemps versus the equivalence principle.

So i wonder, if that variation would be irrefutably confirmed how would it affect LQG?

I mean, LQG depends strongly in the equivalence principle. If that is violated from the very first still makes sense to do LQG?

I remeber that Magueijo, on ofthe more active researchers in VSL´s had gone to the perimeter institute soi suspect it can be some workaround to do LQG even if alpha is not a constant. Someone has detaills?
I saw an article a couple of days ago which says that the spectral lines of very distant quazars indicate that the fundamental constants may have been differents in the early universe. Did anyone else catch that article?

Yes, I wonder how this would effect LQG. And I wonder how that would effect the accelerating expansion rate of the univerese.

Yea, just found it. The article is here:

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/13816702/

For example, if the fine structure constant was stronger in the past, would that mean that supernovae would be brighter in the past than today so that their dimmer appearance means they are farther away than expected so that the cosmological expansion is accelerating more than expected?
 
Last edited:
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top