How would this capacitor configuration work?

AI Thread Summary
In a capacitor with two different dielectrics between parallel plates, the charge distribution on the plates may not remain uniform, leading to varying potential differences across the capacitor. This non-uniformity can result in a non-conservative electric field, as the charges may reposition themselves to maintain a constant potential drop when connected to a constant voltage source. Without current, the conductors remain equipotential, but the polarization of the dielectrics creates an effective charge density that influences charge rearrangement. The assumption of uniform charge distribution is typically valid for isolated conductors, such as spheres or infinite plates, but not for configurations with multiple dielectrics. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately analyzing capacitor behavior in complex dielectric environments.
azure kitsune
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Assume you have two parallel plates with charges +q and -q.

Now, you fill the space in between with two different dielectrics so that if you were to move straight from one plate to the other, you would be in the same dielectric. (In other words, the two dielectrics do not form "layers.")

My question is: What happens to the charges on the plates?

Do they stay uniformly distributed? This would mean the potential difference across the capacitor is different at different locations. Wouldn't this make the electric field inside the capacitor non-conservative?

Do the charges move reposition themselves so that the potential difference remains constant? If this were true, wouldn't the charges have a tendency to go back to uniform distribution because the closer-packed ones would repel each other more?

If the capacitor is connected to an EMF source with constant voltage, then I believe the charges would reposition themselves to maintain the same potential drop. But what if there is no current?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The conductors will always be equipotential, due to E = 0 inside the conductor. The dielectrics are polarized in the direction of E, which means there is an effective charge density next to each conductor. This allows the charge inside the conductor to be re-arranged.
 
Thank you for explaining! I think I understand. Is the following statement correct?:

For a charged conducting plate by itself, the charge would be uniformly distributed on the two surfaces because there is no other way for E to be 0 inside. For a capacitor with two dielectrics, the charge is not uniformly distributed, so the electric field inside the plate due to the charges on the surface alone is not zero. However, the net electric field inside the conductor (which includes E from the polarized dielectrics) is zero.
 
It's not really safe to assume charge is distributed uniformly, even for isolated conductor. Except perhaps spheres or infinite plates. You usually start with the assumption of a constant voltage on the conductor, and then solve for the charge density.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top