How Would You Choose the Winning Number in This Game?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaleidoscope
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game Model
kaleidoscope
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
a group of 1000 players are asked to write a number greater than 0. the player who writes the lowest non-repeated number wins a prize.

how would you determine which number to pick?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
case A: if it can be any "type" of number (if the game is not limited to natural numbers- which is what I assume to be the case) just go for an infinitesimal hyperreal infinitely close to 0 (non-standard analysis thingie). not many will think of that one, and besides there is an infinity of such numbers so the chances of 2 people picking the same number are rather low. :P

B: if the game is limited to natural numbers between 0 and 1000... hmmm, that's tricky- I'm not sure.
is there any probabilities and human psychology expert around?

EDIT:
... ooops, I wasn't quite paying attention... 1000 players must choose a positive number... not a number between 0 and 1000... well, I guess case A is a good choice then. :D
 
Last edited:
If we can choose any positive real number, this is basically the same as trying to think of the largest number you possibly can, then take it's reciprocal.

This is interesting only if it is restricted to positive integers. Psychology is definitely involved, since you have to imagine what numbers the other 1000 might choose. I'm thinking I'd choose something fairly high to avoid repeating another's pick. Perhaps 63 or somewhere thereabouts?

It would be interesting to repeat this game a number of times and see what sort of distribution the numbers follow.
 
I like to argue that suppose a player chose numbers follow an exponential distribution. Positive skewed exponential mean incline to choose small number but not too small.

The 1000 chosen numbers is certainly an ordered finite set. Use binomial principle I can know the probability of X number of people chose numbers lower than me.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top