How would you go about solving these set of equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Say you have a set of equations of the form
\left\{ \begin{array}{rl}<br /> x+y+z &amp;=a \\<br /> xy + xz + yz &amp;= b \\<br /> xyz &amp;= c<br /> \end{array} \right.
(for clarity: I'm working over the regular numbers)
how would you go about solving it elegantly? (or at least rewriting it as linear equations)

I'm thinking of something analogous to how you can solve
\left\{ \begin{array}{rl}<br /> x+y &amp;=a \\<br /> xy &amp;= b<br /> \end{array} \right.
namely by noting that (x-y)² = (x+y)² - 4xy = a² - 4b (and after taking the square root we're left with two good ol' linear equations, i.e. x+y=... and x-y=..., a form which I regard as "being solved")
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mr. vodka said:
Say you have a set of equations of the form
\left\{ \begin{array}{rl}<br /> x+y+z &amp;=a \\<br /> xy + xz + yz &amp;= b \\<br /> xyz &amp;= c<br /> \end{array} \right.
(for clarity: I'm working over the regular numbers)
how would you go about solving it elegantly? (or at least rewriting it as linear equations)

I'm thinking of something analogous to how you can solve
\left\{ \begin{array}{rl}<br /> x+y &amp;=a \\<br /> xy &amp;= b<br /> \end{array} \right.
namely by noting that (x-y)² = (x+y)² - 4xy = a² - 4b (and after taking the square root we're left with two good ol' linear equations, i.e. x+y=... and x-y=..., a form which I regard as "being solved")

Hey mr. vodka.

Have you tried just subsituting two of the variables to get the whole thing in a third one?

So for example you could everything in terms of z by taking (1) to get x = a - y - z and taking (2) to get y = (b - xz)(x + z) and then plug in (1) and (2) and simplify to get an equation for (3) giving z = c/xy where you get an expression in terms of only z.

You could do it in more than one way (this is only one possible way), but then you would end up with some kind of equation and at the worst you can use a root-finding algorithm, and probably use a few transformations to get the thing in surd form if it exists (using your ideas in your original post).
 
Call the equations 1, 2 and 3

Multiply 2 by z

xyz+xz2+yz2=bz

Subtract 3

(x+y)z2 = bz-c

Substitute into 1

(bz-c)/z2+z=a

Can you take the cubic from there?
 
Last edited:
Thank you both for your trouble. Studiot's method was more like something I was looking for, thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top