How would you minimise these gravimetric analysis errors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter man0005
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Errors
AI Thread Summary
Gravimetric analysis errors can arise from impurities in precipitates, such as other ions that increase weight, and from incomplete dissolution of BaSO4 due to its low solubility, which can lead to inaccurate mass percentages. Coprecipitation is identified as a significant factor affecting purity. To minimize these errors, it is suggested to take multiple samples from different sections of a non-homogeneous fertilizer sample and calculate an average. This approach aims to ensure a more representative analysis of the sulfur content. Proper methodology in sampling is essential for accurate results in gravimetric analysis.
man0005
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



-precipitate not being pure e.g. other ions (present in the precipitate increasing the weight of the precipitate)
- in an experiment where BaSO4 is used and some of it isn't dissolved in the wash due to the 'low solubility' of BaSO4 - resulting in a lower weight, decreasing the percentage by mass of the precipitate.
-impurities in the sample


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
man0005 said:
-precipitate not being pure e.g. other ions (present in the precipitate increasing the weight of the precipitate)

Sometimes called coprecipitation.

in an experiment where BaSO4 is used and some of it isn't dissolved in the wash due to the 'low solubility' of BaSO4 - resulting in a lower weight, decreasing the percentage by mass of the precipitate.

No idea what you mean.

impurities in the sample

How is it different from the first point?

But, it is up to you to try to solve the question. So, how do you propose to minimize errors?
 
with the co precipitation
since I am finding the amount of sulfur in a samle of fertiliser
Since the sample is non homogenous, you could get samples from the bottom, top and middle of the fertiliser and test them? Then average them out?
Could you please help me elaborate on that/explain it a little better ><
 
Sorry, I have no idea what you are asking about.

Methodology of taking samples has nothing to do with coprecipitation.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top