Huggins Displacement Theory and Retrocausality

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Huggins Displacement Theory, attributed to Victorian astronomer Sir William Huggins, proposes a method for sending information into the past without causing contradictions, by utilizing the concept of a past lightcone. This theory suggests that if information is sent back in time, it must also be displaced spatially, preventing paradoxes such as the Grandfather paradox. For instance, if a message about a stock price rise is sent back one year, it must travel a light-year away, ensuring that the sender cannot profit from the information. However, the theory still faces challenges, as it could potentially lead to time paradoxes if messages are relayed back and forth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the concept of lightcones in physics
  • Familiarity with time travel theories and paradoxes
  • Basic knowledge of electromagnetic radiation principles
  • Awareness of the Grandfather paradox in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of past lightcones in theoretical physics
  • Explore the Grandfather paradox and its resolutions in time travel theories
  • Investigate the relationship between electromagnetic radiation and time travel
  • Study the Huggins Displacement Theory in more detail through academic papers
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, theoretical researchers, and anyone interested in the complexities of time travel and its associated paradoxes will benefit from this discussion.

johne1618
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
I was looking at the Wikipedia entries on Time Travel and the Grandfather paradox and noticed a paragraph on the so-called Huggins Displacement Theory. I haven't been able to find the source although I assume it's originator was the Victorian astronomer Sir William Huggins. Does anyone know of the precise reference?

Normally sending information into one's past can lead to contradictions. For example based on some condition now I could send a message into my past that prevents that very condition from occurring in my present. Thus sending information into the past, and therefore arbitrarily changing it, seems to be forbidden physically.

However the Huggins Displacement Theory says that there is a loop-hole in this argument (or more accurately a "corner case"!) I could send information along my past lightcone so that if I influence something a year in my past then it must be a light-year away from me. Thus no change in the past has a enough time to travel back to me to cause a contradiction in my present.

For example imagine that I see a stock price going up today. The Huggins Theory says that I can beam knowledge of this stock price rise back in time provided that the message is also displaced by a comparable distance. Thus if I send it back a year in time then it must also travel away from me by a light-year in distance. If my twin gets the message then he might try to profit from the information by sending back a message to me to buy the stock. Unfortunately the message will only get back to me at the instant that the price rises so that neither myself nor my twin will be able to profit from this situation.

Maybe physics does allow information to be sent back in time along a past lightcone so that this effect could be measured. My hunch is that perhaps if one charged up an electrode then electrostatic influences from it might travel back along its lightcone to cause measureable repulsion or attraction on distant electrodes.

I don't think electromagnetic radiation itself could go backwards in time as in principle it could be reflected back onto an observer's past worldline and therefore trigger contradictions in his/her present.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I raised this issue on Physics Stack Exchange and got a reply saying:

This doesn't seem to work, for the following reason: the theory says I can send a message back in time one year to you, one light-year away. But you can then relay the message back to me one year ago (and one light-year away) as well. That means I receive the message two years before I sent it, leading to grandfather-type paradoxes.

So the Huggins Theory could still lead to time paradoxes.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K