Human Bird Wings: Is It Real or Fake?

In summary, the idea of human bird wings has been a subject of fascination for many years, with some people even attempting to create functional wings. However, it is important to note that the concept of humans having wings is purely fictional and not feasible in reality. While there have been some advancements in technology that allow for wing-like structures to be attached to the body, these are not capable of providing actual flight for humans. Additionally, the human body is not designed for flying and lacks the necessary physical adaptations, such as hollow bones and powerful chest muscles, that birds possess. Therefore, the idea of human bird wings remains a fictional concept and should not be considered a possibility in real life.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
From your second link:
.,,I think the animation cycle on the figure is borrowed from the monkeys in Wizard of Oz."
That was my first thought at seeing the video - and it's been a long time since I've seen that movie!
 
  • #3
russ_watters said:
From your second link: That was my first thought at seeing the video - and it's been a long time since I've seen that movie!

Which brings to mind an interesting point. While human-powered flight isn't practical due to our strength limitations, flying monkeys are probably doable.
 
  • #6
zoobyshoe said:
There's been human powered flight:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossamer_Albatross

I didn't say impossible, I said impractical. The rider had to generate something like 400 watts continuous, which is beyond most people's ability for all but a very short time - less than a minute. The guy who did that had to train for a very long time.

However the idea of flapping wings with the arms to achieve flight is probably impossible for a human; at least for more than a few feet in altitude and a very short flight.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Watching that video, my guess would be that the very beginning and end of the clip - the parts that include the second frame - is actually the entire flight. He may have gotten a few feet of air but I think that's it.
 
  • #8
A bird uses a tail for control. No control of this thing is why I go with fake. The Configuration does not fit a hang glider and its control either.

Things don't fit.
 
  • #9
Experts lean toward it being a fake.

Coker thinks the footage is fake. This isn't obvious in the latest video of the successful flight, but an earlier outtake of a short hop into the air on Jan. 20 was clearly tampered with. At the 1:51 minute mark, the cameraman pans away from Smeets wearing his Human Bird Wings just as he begins to flap his arms. When the camera pans back, Smeets and his contraption have been replaced with a CGI (computer generated imagery) human and wings.

"That method of pan away just before the CGI action is common [in faked videos]," Coker said.

The March 18 video was made with more care, but it, too, strikes CGI experts as an elaborate fake. Ryan Martin, Technical Director at Industrial Light & Magic, and his colleagues told the techblog Gizmodo that the video's poor focus covers up most evidence of CGI, but that the cloth material of Smeets' wings looks unnaturally stiff, and is computer generated.

Furthermore, the experts point out that the animation cycle of Smeets flying through the air seems to be modeled on a clip of a flying monkey in the Wizard of Oz. However, Martin and his colleagues also view the pan-away in the Jan. 20 video, and the differences between Smeets' and the wings' appearance before and after the pan, as the smoking gun that the whole Human Bird Wings project is a fraud. In particular, after the pan, a black square appears on the right wing that was clearly not there before.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012...o-fake-probably-ad-expert-says/#ixzz1preOMH2y
 
  • #10
I took my daughter dozens of times to the playground you see there in the video :smile:
It's just around he corner here. Well, I haven't been a witness unfortunately but maybe
we'll get to see something in the next few days.

In the other videos you see the two 2000W brush less electrical motors in his backpack
which together with the gearboxes produce the wing flapping which is controlled via the
accelerometers on his arms. So he's moving his arms but the motors should do the work.

The mechanics: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH3fQbGlQlM&list=UU7W2f5n5vYfM7TYVir3iPGw&index=6&feature=plcp
The design: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgD0fYAaLq4&list=UU7W2f5n5vYfM7TYVir3iPGw&index=11&feature=plcp
All videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/jarnosmeets80?feature=watch
Some discussions on gizmode: http://gizmodo.com/5894904/man-flies-like-a-bird-flapping-his-own-wings


Is it true or not? Will be revealed in the 22th March edition of "de wereld draaid door"

Hans.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
This whole thread reminded me of this:"The Miracle of Flight: A cutout animation by Terry Gilliam**" on YouTube** In part, the animator for Monty Python
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Put 80 pound weights on the ends of your arms and start flapping. Because that is how much each arm has to support if the guy weighs 160 pounds. Doable - No. Its all fake.

But the artist set out to cause a sensation and he does seem successful with the interest and discussion of his video. The artistic intention could have been to prove how gullable people are visually.
 
  • #13
There have been human Power Flight, and there have been Battery/Motor powered flight. There have been Solar Powered Flight. There have been gas powered flight :).

This man didn't do anything new, even if its not fake. And on top of that he looks fake. Why are we giving so much importance to all this event?
 
  • #14
I_am_learning said:
Why are we giving so much importance to all this event?
Good question. I have no idea. Just another stupid viral video.
 
  • #15
I_am_learning said:
There have been human Power Flight, and there have been Battery/Motor powered flight. There have been Solar Powered Flight. There have been gas powered flight :).

This man didn't do anything new, even if its not fake. And on top of that he looks fake. Why are we giving so much importance to all this event?

I was going to say that there has never been human-powered flapping flight, but not true.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E77j1imdhQ
 
  • #16
Ivan Seeking said:
I didn't say impossible, I said impractical. The rider had to generate something like 400 watts continuous, which is beyond most people's ability for all but a very short time - less than a minute. The guy who did that had to train for a very long time.
It's a strange objection to say it's impractical. Impractical for what purpose? How practical do you want it to be? Most people can't pedal a bicycle for as long as he took to cross the English Channel. Does that mean bicycles are impractical? A lot of people can't walk continuously for two hours. Is walking impractical?

I think he more than demonstrated human powered flight is possible, not just in theory, but in practice: it can be practically achieved. If you want it to be a practical alternative to commercial airline transportation, then no. But then bicycles aren't practical for the same reason: they're not going to replace cars. If everyone owned and could pedal a Gossamer Albatross for over two hours, they'd still be impractical: there'd be no place to park them all, and I doubt anyone could get insurance.
 
  • #17
zoobyshoe said:
It's a strange objection to say it's impractical. Impractical for what purpose? How practical do you want it to be?

It is impractical as compared to riding a bicycle the same distance, which only requires a fraction of the energy. It is impractical as it could never be a viable form of transportation, like a bicycle. It is impractical because the average person could never get off the ground.

However, flying monkeys may be another matter. I have a new goal in life.
 
  • #18
256bits said:
Put 80 pound weights on the ends of your arms and start flapping. Because that is how much each arm has to support if the guy weighs 160 pounds. Doable - No. Its all fake.
Check out Hansdevrie's first link: the wings are mechanically operated in sync with his arm motions. There doesn't seem to be any claim of human powered flight here.
 
  • #20
Borek said:
Fake:

http://m.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/birdman-admits-hoax/
The man who claimed to achieve bird-like flight with a custom-built contraption came clean today: It was a hoax 8 months in the making.

Idiots... How can really smart people be so dumb, they must be thinking, haha... I fooled you morons for 8 months and now I am fessing up because the truth is about to break. Put your efforts into really doing what was faked, then I would be impressed.

Rhody... :frown:
 
  • #21
Borek said:
Fake:

http://m.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/birdman-admits-hoax/

Since the wings aren't alleged to be human powered, I have to admit I would never have suspected this of being hoaxed. The CGI must certainly be Hollywood quality; none of it looks hinkey to me. The only thing he's done different than a glider is the take off, and that doesn't seem far fetched to me given he's got a motor flapping the wings for him.
 
  • #22
zoobyshoe said:
Check out Hansdevrie's first link: the wings are mechanically operated in sync with his arm motions. There doesn't seem to be any claim of human powered flight here.

I meant to say the arms that the motor moves, and used the example of the weights to give an idea of the power needed for flapping - he has 2 small motors and 4 5000mAh batteries. I didn't think it was enough.
 

1. Is it scientifically possible for humans to have wings?

Currently, there is no scientific evidence or research to support the idea of humans growing functional wings. The human body is not designed for flight, and our bones and muscles are not strong enough to support the weight of wings. Additionally, our respiratory and circulatory systems are not adapted for the demands of flying. While some animals have evolved to have wings, it is not a natural feature of the human body.

2. Have there been any successful attempts at creating human bird wings?

There have been several attempts at creating human bird wings, but they have all been proven to be fake. The most famous example is the "Human Birdwings Project" by Dutch engineer Jarno Smeets, who claimed to have created functional wings using a harness, motors, and a smartphone app. However, it was later revealed to be a viral marketing stunt and not a real scientific achievement.

3. What about the viral videos showing people with wings flying?

Many viral videos claiming to show humans with wings flying have been debunked as hoaxes or illusions. Some use camera tricks or CGI to create the appearance of flight, while others use harnesses or other equipment to give the illusion of wings. These videos should not be taken as evidence of real human bird wings.

4. Are there any genetic or evolutionary explanations for human bird wings?

No, there is no scientific evidence to support the idea of humans having the genetic potential for growing wings. Evolutionarily, wings have only developed in animals such as birds, bats, and insects, and there is no evidence that humans have any genetic mutations that could lead to the growth of functional wings.

5. What are the potential dangers of attempting to create human bird wings?

Aside from the fact that it is currently scientifically impossible, attempting to create human bird wings could be extremely dangerous. Flying requires a specific set of physical adaptations that humans do not possess, and any attempts to artificially create wings could result in serious injury or even death. It is important to rely on scientific research and evidence rather than attempting to create something that goes against the natural capabilities of the human body.

Similar threads

Current and Future AI Threats to Humanity and the Human Response
    • Computing and Technology
Replies
10
Views
2K
Can birds hover and soar at the same time?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
11
Views
9K
What colors and attributes could alien flora & fauna have?
    • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
3K
News Should the US intervene in world problems?
    • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K
Things I Learned from Movies
    • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
Why are we here? What I have learned
    • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
4K
Philip Johnson's Darwin on Trial
    • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
2
Views
3K
A suggestion for dolphin communication.
    • Biology and Medical
Replies
6
Views
5K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 242)
    • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236)
    • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top