Is humid air really heavier than dry air?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air
AI Thread Summary
Humid air is less dense than dry air because water vapor, with a lower molecular weight of 18, replaces heavier nitrogen and oxygen molecules, which have atomic masses of 28 and 32, respectively. This means that when water vapor is added to the air, it displaces some of the heavier gases, resulting in a lower overall mass per volume. The professor's assertion that humid air is heavier is incorrect; humid air is actually lighter under the same pressure and temperature conditions. The concept aligns with the ideal gas law, where the total number of molecules per unit volume is determined by pressure, temperature, and the specific gas constants. Understanding this principle clarifies the relationship between humidity and air density.
Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
Humid or dry air "heavier"?

It would seem that the addition of water vapor in the air would increase the mass of the volume of air thus making it "heavier." However, the professor in class today said humid air is typically heavier because humid air has water vapor as opposed to the more massive nitrogen and oxygen molecules. Does the water vapor somehow displace/replace the nitrogen and oxygen molecules?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


As air is pretty close to an ideal gas, the total number of molecules per unit volume is n=P/(RT). Water molecules have an atomic mass of about 18, a lot less than 28 for nitrogen molecules and 32 for oxygen molecules. Humid air will thus be less dense than dry air, assuming both are at the same pressure and temperature.
 


D H said:
As air is pretty close to an ideal gas, the total number of molecules per unit volume is n=P/(RT). Water molecules have an atomic mass of about 18, a lot less than 28 for nitrogen molecules and 32 for oxygen molecules. Humid air will thus be less dense than dry air, assuming both are at the same pressure and temperature.

Ok. That's what I was thinking. It's just an introductory meteorology class, so he didn't clarify enough for it to entirely make sense for me (physics major).
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
19K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Back
Top