Huygens principle consequence of isotropy

  • Thread starter Thread starter jd12345
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Huygens Principle
AI Thread Summary
Huygens' principle is not strictly a consequence of the isotropy of space, as it can also apply in anisotropic conditions. The principle states that every point on a wavefront can be considered a source of secondary waves. The discussion highlights the behavior of sound waves, noting that while air molecules vibrate in various directions, the net effect depends on the wavelength and the nature of the wave. There is no definitive proof of Huygens' principle, but it is a well-established model that effectively describes wave propagation. Overall, the principle's applicability and functionality in different contexts are emphasized.
jd12345
Messages
251
Reaction score
2
IS huygens principle a consequence of isotropy of space? According to wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huygens–Fresnel_principle it is

I don't really understand this : let's say a sound wave , a vibrator pushes the air molecule does this mean that molecule vibrates in all directions? Ofcourse the air molecule's backward vibrations will be canceled by the vibrators forward vibration but will the molecules vibrate in other directions too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jd12345 said:
IS huygens principle a consequence of isotropy of space? According to wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huygens–Fresnel_principle it is
Not really: the Huygens principle can equally well be used for anisotropic space. The principle is that every point can be regarded as a source of secondary waves.
I don't really understand this : let's say a sound wave , a vibrator pushes the air molecule does this mean that molecule vibrates in all directions? Ofcourse the air molecule's backward vibrations will be canceled by the vibrators forward vibration but will the molecules vibrate in other directions too?
Good point; it depends on the wavelength if the resulting pressure wave spreads out strongly or not, thus qualitatively similar to light. Note that Huygens primarily modeled light (I think), which is modeled as a transverse wave (oscillating perpendicular to the propagation). Thus your issue doesn't arise with light, but it could be interesting to discuss how much longitudinal waves behave differently.
 
ok actually my initial doubt was: IS there a proof to huygens principle that every point is regarded as a source of secondary waves? I thought the isotropy of space could explain it but as you say its not necessary
So is there a proof for huygens principle?
 
jd12345 said:
ok actually my initial doubt was: IS there a proof to huygens principle that every point is regarded as a source of secondary waves? I thought the isotropy of space could explain it but as you say its not necessary
So is there a proof for huygens principle?
It's a successfully working model. And on top of that, it makes sense. What more can you ask for?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top