Hydraulics help please -- Energy loss in a long pipeline

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating energy loss in a long pipeline using the energy conservation equation. Participants clarify the assumptions regarding pressure (P1) and velocity heads at different sections of the pipeline. The correct approach involves recognizing that P1 is not zero unless specified as a vacuum and that energy head is derived from the total energy at both sections. The Darcy-Weisbach equation and the Hazen-Williams equation can be used to determine head loss, but they yield different results based on the flow conditions and pipe characteristics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the energy conservation equation in fluid mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Darcy-Weisbach equation for head loss calculations
  • Knowledge of the Hazen-Williams equation for flow in pipes
  • Basic concepts of pressure, velocity head, and energy head in fluid systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Darcy-Weisbach equation for various pipe materials and flow conditions
  • Learn how to calculate head loss using the Hazen-Williams equation for different pipe diameters
  • Explore the concept of energy head and its components in fluid systems
  • Investigate the continuity equation and its role in analyzing flow in reservoir systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid mechanics students, and professionals involved in pipeline design and analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on energy loss calculations in hydraulic systems.

fayan77
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Screen Shot 2018-10-04 at 7.43.51 PM.png

Homework Equations


y1 + P1/##\gamma##+v1/2g=y2 + P2/##\gamma##+v2/2g+hL

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the above equation and assumed that P1=0 and both velocity heads are equal. Is that valid? However I did not need to use the geometry of the pipe so I think I am doing something wrong. Can someone point me in the right direction?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-10-04 at 7.43.51 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-10-04 at 7.43.51 PM.png
    12.6 KB · Views: 766
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are right, the pipe is uniform, but since the problem asked for energy loss, you must derive (from the energy conservation equation) a correct equation that has some kind of energy loss. In the end it must be some kind of power loss ##P=\frac {dW} {dt}##.
Sorry I loss my mind for a moment, yes it's the loss per feet.
 
Last edited:
Im looking for energy loss in terms of feet not power loss. I have a lot of information
Pressure
heights
flow rate
length
diameter
no roughness
what is throwing me off is that if I use general energy equation are my assumptions correct that P1=0 and that velocity heads are eqaual?
If i use darcy weisbach eq. i do not have temperature or roughness to help me determine friction factor
 
I think P1 is 1atm, not 0 like you assumed, this pressure (P1) only equal zero if the head is placed in vacuum, or the inlet pressure is the reference pressure. In the first case the water would be boiled off to vacuum and then this question would be invalid. In the second case I believe they must first say that the reference is at that point (the inlet). They just say the pressure at the outlet is 18psi so that mean it is the absolute pressure (reference to vacuum) and that the inlet pressure is at normal condition of 1atm. For the velocity I think they are equal.
 
What is the definition of "energy head?"
 
potential energy of a static column of water (height) + velocity head + pressure head... the equation I have written above
 
The give you the energy head at point 1 and they give you everything you need to calculate the energy head at point 2. The difference is the energy loss (head).
 
So my assumptions are correct? velocity heads are the same and that pressure at the top = 0? And while I have you here, does Darcy's equation and Heinz-Williams yield the same loss? can I use them in combination to solve for a particular problem?
 
fayan77 said:
So my assumptions are correct? velocity heads are the same and that pressure at the top = 0? And while I have you here, does Darcy's equation and Heinz-Williams yield the same loss? can I use them in combination to solve for a particular problem?
None of this is right. We have $$y_1+\frac{p_1}{\gamma}+\frac{v_1^2}{2g}=80\ ft$$From the information provided in the problem statement, what are ##y_2##, ##\frac{P_2}{\gamma}##, and ##\frac{v_2^2}{2g}##?
 
  • #10
y2 = 12
P2/##\gamma## = 18*144/62.4 =41.5
velocity head @ section 2 = (Q/A)2/64.4 = .14

solving for hL = 80 - 12 - 41.5 - .14 = 26.36 ft

why is P1 = 0? and why is velocity head @ section 1 = 0?
 
  • #11
fayan77 said:
y2 = 12
P2/##\gamma## = 18*144/62.4 =41.5
velocity head @ section 2 = (Q/A)2/64.4 = .14

solving for hL = 80 - 12 - 41.5 - .14 = 26.36 ft
Correct
why is P1 = 0? and why is velocity head @ section 1 = 0?
Who says?[/QUOTE]
 
  • #12
OOOOOHHHH I see, problem states energy head for section 1 as a whole is 80 ft I was fixated that 80ft was y1... got it

Thank you.

On another note whenever I am solving a problem with a two reservoir system we assume velocity heads are zero because of their size the dh/dt is basically 0 correct? So if I have a system with only one reservoir i will have an equation like so, Energy head section 1 = velocity head + hL can I use continuity equation to solve for velocity or will velocity vary with head loss?
 
  • #13
fayan77 said:
OOOOOHHHH I see, problem states energy head for section 1 as a whole is 80 ft I was fixated that 80ft was y1... got it

Thank you.

On another note whenever I am solving a problem with a two reservoir system we assume velocity heads are zero because of their size the dh/dt is basically 0 correct? So if I have a system with only one reservoir i will have an equation like so, Energy head section 1 = velocity head + hL can I use continuity equation to solve for velocity or will velocity vary with head loss?
For any reservoir, dh/dt is usually small.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: roam

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
717
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K