Bernoulli equation with losses dilemma

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Bernoulli equation in a fluid dynamics problem involving losses due to friction in a piping system. Participants are examining specific calculations related to the equation, including assumptions made about the system's parameters and the interpretation of certain values used in the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the derivation of the value "0.5" in the equation for losses, suggesting it should be "1".
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the inclusion of certain terms in the square root formula used for calculating velocity.
  • There is a discussion about the total length of the tubing, with participants stating it is 32 meters, which is the length that experiences frictional pressure drop.
  • Some participants seek clarification on why the total length of tubing is calculated as 20 + 10 + 2 meters instead of just considering the height.
  • One participant emphasizes the need to account for the entire length of the pipe when considering viscous wall friction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness of the original calculations and assumptions, with some asserting that errors were made while others seek clarification on the reasoning behind certain values. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct interpretation of specific terms and values in the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached consensus on the correct approach to the problem, and there are multiple interpretations of the values used in the equations. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying the Bernoulli equation with losses and the assumptions involved.

williamcarter
Messages
153
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Hello,Could you please lend me a hand with this problem?I would really appreciate it.
Question:[/B]
Capture.JPG


Their Answer:
Capture2.JPG


KL=2*0.75(2 elbows) D=5*10^-2 m ;f=0.001(fanning friction factor)
Assumptions I made:
Point 1 which is at the top of the liquid in the tank:
h1=23 m; u1=0m/s(neglected due to Area differences) P1=0 gauge(atmos press)

Point 2 which is at the mouthpiece of fountain:
h2=0m(datum); u2=? P2=0 gauge(atmos press)

Homework Equations


We know bernoulli for losses with fanning friction factor
P1/ro*g+h1+u1^2/2*g=P2/ro*g+h2+u2^2/2*g +delta hloss

where delta hloss=K*u^2/2g
where K=f*4*L/D+Ki
where Ki=sum of K in our case 2*0.75(2 elbows)
where f is fanning friction factor.

The Attempt at a Solution


P1/ro*g+h1+u1^2/2*g=P2/ro*g+h2+u2^2/2*g +delta hloss
As we made the assumption in first step.This can be rewritten as:
h1=delta h loss
=>h1=K*u^2/2*g
h1=(f*4*L/D+Ki)*u^2/2g
=>u=sqrt(h1*2g)/(f*4*L/D+Ki)
and substituting values in this formula gives u=10.05 m/s
However their answer is 9.0 m/s

I do not understand
1) why they did Ki=0.5+2*0.75, from where comes that "0.5"?
2)From where comes that "1+" in their sqrt formula
2)Why they picked L=20+10+2

Thank you in advance , much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my judgment, all three items that you cited are errors that they made.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
Chestermiller said:
In my judgment, all three items that you cited are errors that they made.
Thank you very much for your quick response.
I would be more than glad if you could let me know how was the correct approach.
 
The 0.5 should be a 1, and the 1 shouldn't be there. I was wrong about the L. The total length of tubing is 20 + 10 (horizontal) + 2 (vertical).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
Chestermiller said:
The 0.5 should be a 1, and the 1 shouldn't be there. I was wrong about the L. The total length of tubing is 20 + 10 (horizontal) + 2 (vertical).

Thank you, could you please tell me why we need to add 20+10+2.
Why is it needed to add 20+10+2? And why we can't take in consideration just the height?
Why is it needed to do like that?
I mean why we cannot put just the height ,20 m?or 25m?
 
Last edited:
williamcarter said:
Thank you, could you please tell me why we need to add 20+10+2.
Why is it needed to add 20+10+2? And why we can't take in consideration just the height?
Why is it needed to do like that?
I mean why we cannot put just the height ,20 m?or 25m?
The total length of tubing is 32 meters. This is the length that experiences a frictional pressure drop.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
Chestermiller said:
The total length of tubing is 32 meters. This is the length that experiences a frictional pressure drop.
Ok I understood this, thank you.But how do you know that?
 
williamcarter said:
Ok I understood this, thank you.But how do you know that?
Waddya mean? How long is the tubing?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
Chestermiller said:
Waddya mean? How long is the tubing?
The total length of tubing is 32 meters. This is the length that experiences a frictional pressure drop.

How do you know that?How did you identified that?What was the criteria to get to that value?What was the mechanism behind it?
 
  • #10
williamcarter said:
How do you know that?How did you identified that?What was the criteria to get to that value?What was the mechanism behind it?
If fluid flows in one end of a pipe and comes out the other end, doesn't it have to travel through the entire length of pipe to get from one end to the other? Isn't there viscous wall friction over the entire length?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
If fluid flows in one end of a pipe and comes out the other end, doesn't it have to travel through the entire length of pipe to get from one end to the other? Isn't there viscous wall friction over the entire length?
Yes,it is, thank you, now is clear, much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K