Hydrodynamic entrance length: independent of Re?

AI Thread Summary
The hydrodynamic entrance length in a channel is influenced by the Reynolds number, with a minimum dependence noted in certain equations, such as the one from Deen's "Analysis of Transport Phenomena." The equation indicates that the entrance length can be expressed as a function of Reynolds number, with an additional constant offset. This offset represents effects that are not solely dependent on the flow's inertia, suggesting that even at low Reynolds numbers, there is a necessary entrance length for flow development. The discussion seeks clarification on the nature of this offset and its implications for flow behavior, especially in scenarios like creeping flow. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately predicting flow characteristics in various applications.
MichielM
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I have learned that the hydrodynamic entrance length of a channel (to form fully developed laminar flow) is correlated to the Reynolds number, because the shear effects have to propagate inwards from the walls of the channel. However recently I found out that there is a 'minimum' to the dependence on the reynolds number, for example in Deen (Analysis of transport phenomena) I find for a cylindrical tube:
\frac{L_v}{R}=1.18+0.112 Re with Re=\frac{2 U R}{\nu}
With R the radius and L_v the entrance length.

The Reynolds dependent term in this equation I can understand (and derive), but I do not know what effect is responsible for the 'offset'. Can anyone explain to me why this occurs?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even for creeping flow, there has got to be some sort of entrance length. The equation is just a rough approximation.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top