I Hydrogen 21 cm line time?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter jv11
  • Start date Start date
jv11
Messages
12
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
Hydrogen line 21 cm happens every 10 milion years .
For Bohr radius circumference and this time
Does formula S/t=v
Applies for this ?
I think this is silly question ,
But I need second opinion about it.
From time t=0.34x10^15 sec(21 cm hydrogen time )
And C=33.22x10^-11 ( Bohr radius circumference)

Would the speed of electron inside the hydrogen cloud be calculated :

Ve=C/t
Ve=33.22x10^-11/0.34x10^15
Ve=9.7x 10^-25m/s

Tx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jv11 said:
Hydrogen line 21 cm happens every 10 milion years .
What does this statement even mean?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
jv11 said:
Would the speed of electron inside the hydrogen cloud....
What do you mean by "the hydrogen cloud"?

But no matter what you mean by that, it makes no sense to talk about the speed of a bound electron. It may be possible to apply the notion of speed to a free electron, but nearly always momentum is more useful/informative.
 
Hi
HYPERFINE structure of hydrogen happens when electron spin inside the cloud changes direction (to protons spin).
It happens in f=2.9x10^-15 1/sec
Or t‎ = 0.34x10^15
The 21cm line is produced by a change in the direction of the electron's spin within this ground state.
The lowest possible energy level for an electron in a hydrogen atom is -13.6 eV, which corresponds to the ground state (n=1) in the Bohr model). At this energy level, the electron is closest to the proton, and its distance is described by the Bohr radius (approximately 0.53 x 10^-10 meters).
From average Bohr radius circumference and time t
We can calculate the speed of electron at Rb.
Ve=C/t
Ve=33.22x10^-11/0.34x10^15
Ve=9.7x10^-25m/s
If there is 9.7 x10^25 hydrogen atoms in close vicinity,every second
21 cm like will be emitted.
From this we can conclude that 1 electron inside the cloud travels the same time t=0.34x10^15s.
 
Does this make any sense to experts ?
 
jv11 said:
Does this make any sense to experts ?
No. I am sorry to say that it is complete nonsense.
The Bohr was abandoned long ago because it does not adequately describe electrons and cannot be used to develop further understanding of their behaviors. It makes no sense to talk about the speed or position of a bound electron.

As this thread is based on a misconception it is closed.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top