Hydrogen Fuel: Generating Electricity with Water

  • Thread starter Thread starter chound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fuel Hydrogen
AI Thread Summary
Generating electricity from water through hydrogen fuel involves electrolyzing water into hydrogen and oxygen, then burning hydrogen in the oxygen to release energy and form water again. However, this process is fundamentally inefficient due to energy losses, with ideal conditions yielding only about 102% efficiency, which is unattainable in practice. Real-world efficiency drops to around 50% after accounting for heat loss and other factors. Consequently, while the concept is theoretically appealing, it is not sustainable as energy output will always be less than input. Ultimately, the system will deplete its hydrogen supply, making it an impractical energy solution.
chound
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to create a structure where
1)water is electrolysed into oxygen and hydrogen
2)Hydrogen is burnt in the same oxygen obtained from step 1
3)This releases lot of energy and forms water
4)This energy can be used to rotate the armature of an electric generator
5)Electricity can be produced
6)The water in step 3 can be used in step 1 :zzz:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yup, yup, yup, yup, yup, and yup. Will "5" take care of "1"? Nope.
 
Since the reaction is symmetrical (water+energy=hydrogen+oxygen=water+energy, etc, etc, etc.), even if you had perfect efficiency, you'd still never get more energy out than you put in.
 
Let's do the math here and see what falls out. Per Faradays constant of electrolysis, it takes about 96,500 coulombs to generate 1 mole of hydrogen gas. After a couple of crunches, it appears to require about 32.9 kilowatts to generate 1 kilogram of hydogen gas. The electrical energy equivalent of a kilogram of hydrogen gas is 33.5 kilowatts. That looks promising, 102% efficiency!

Aye, but there is a rub, as usual. Those are idealized numbers - i.e., they assume 100% efficiency. You can take 17% straight off the top in heat loss. Now the numbers look like this 32.9 x 1.17 and 33.5 x 0.83 = 38.5 kw to get 29.1 kw.. down to 75% efficiency. And this is at laboratory efficiencies. In the real world, the true loss is about 1/3, so the real world efficiency is in the neighborhood of 50%. The bad news is you will run out of gas. The good news is it ain't all that bad a return.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top