Hydrogen Fusion Engine: Steel Sphere & Sulfuric Acid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the concept of using a thick steel hollow sphere filled with sulfuric acid and water to create a hydrogen fusion engine. It highlights a fundamental misunderstanding of Gauss's law, which states that a charged hollow sphere produces no electric field inside, resulting in no force acting on hydrogen ions within the sphere. Participants emphasize the importance of mathematical validation regarding the forces acting on charged particles in this setup. Questions arise about the specifics of removing oxygen ions and the amount of charge applied to the sphere. Ultimately, the thread concludes that the initial premise is flawed, leading to its closure.
Bruce Haawkins
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Have a thick steel hollow sphere with a inside radius of 20 cm. Then fill it up with sulfuric acid and add water. Then remove the oxygen ions. then give the sphere a negative charge and all the hydrogen ions move to the surface of the inside sphere. then charge sphere positive and the hydrogen ions accelerate towards the center of the sphere and fuse.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Apart form other more specific reasons, EM (gauss law) tells you that a charged hollow sphere has no electric field inside. So you won't be able to neither attract or repel H ions.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
Posted has been reminded to maintain a civil attitude in posts
Please do the maths before you speak the charged particle has not gotten an even amount of cancelling forces on it. The forces only cancel right at the center of the sphere.
 
Bruce Haawkins said:
Please do the maths before you speak the charged particle has not gotten an even amount of cancelling forces on it. The forces only cancel right at the center of the sphere.
This is incorrect. As @dRic2 says, the electric field from a charged sphere is zero inside, and hence the force on a charge inside the sphere is zero. This is a standard result, the maths for which was done by Gauss over two centuries ago. See, for example, Wikipedia.
Wikipedia said:
We can use Gauss's law to find the magnitude of the resultant electric field E at a distance r from the center of the charged shell. It is immediately apparent that for a spherical Gaussian surface of radius r < R the enclosed charge is zero: hence the net flux is zero and the magnitude of the electric field on the Gaussian surface is also 0
 
In addition to the other problems.

Bruce Haawkins said:
Then remove the oxygen ions.

How, exactly?

Bruce Haawkins said:
then give the sphere a negative charge

How much exactly?
 
Because the thread is based on a misconception, it is now closed.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top