Hydrostatic behaviour - water in tube

AI Thread Summary
To keep water in an inverted tube, the pressure at the water-air interface must be less than atmospheric pressure, which is determined by the height of the water column. The diameter of the tube does not affect this condition. The maximum height for water to remain without spilling is approximately 10 meters, significantly less than the 48-inch height of the tube. The failure to retain water likely resulted from improper technique during the inversion process. A proper method involves filling the tube to the brim, covering it with a card, and then quickly inverting it while ensuring no liquid spills.
ralphamale
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
To moderator - I had mistakenly posted this to the "General Physics" forum and later noticed the note about not posting there - sorry! I hope this is the correct location for posting the following question.

I am a novice on this site and am trying to find an answer to a question which is: I filled a tube 48" x 1.5" with water, sealing one end and then inverted it - I expected the water to remain due to the vacuum but it did not. Is there a certain ratio of ht. to dia. required to keep the water in the tube? I would appreciate any imput, guidance or direction on this...Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ralphamale said:
Is there a certain ratio of ht. to dia. required to keep the water in the tube?
Yes. For the water not to spill, the pressure on the water-air interface due to the weight of the column must be less than atmospheric pressure. The diameter has nothing to do with it. The condition is ##\rho_{water}gh<p_{atm}##. Solving for the height of the column, we get ##~h<\dfrac{p_{atm}}{\rho_{water}g}.## With ##\rho_{water}=1000 ~\mathrm{kg/m^3}##, ##p_{atm}=100,000~\mathrm{N/m^2}## and ##g=10~\mathrm{m/s^2}##, ##h<10~\mathrm{m}##. This is much less that 48"=1.2 m. It didn't work probably because of faulty procedure. The way to do it is to fill the column to the brim, put a card over the lip and, using your hand to hold the card in place, very quickly invert the column being careful not to spill any liquid. Once the column is upside down, remove your hand holding the card. If the card stays in place, remove it very carefully. I've done this with a 10" cylinder, but never with a 48" cylinder.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top