Hyper Metal-Poor Stars: The First Generation in the Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal Stars
AI Thread Summary
The discovery of hyper metal-poor (HMP) stars, with metallicity significantly lower than solar levels, raises questions about their origins as potential first-generation stars. The authors argue that these stars are actually second-generation, formed from gas enriched by the first generation of supernovae. They highlight unique abundance patterns in HMP stars that align with models of faint supernovae, suggesting extensive mixing and fallback during explosions. Some participants in the discussion question the conclusions of the paper, indicating confusion about the findings and the implications for the classification of these stars. Overall, the research emphasizes the complexity of stellar evolution and chemical enrichment in the early universe.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0505/0505524.pdf

Title: The first chemical enrichment in the universe and the formation of hyper metal-poor stars
Authors: Nobuyuki Iwamoto, Hideyuki Umeda, Nozomu Tominaga, Ken'ichi Nomoto, Keiichi Maeda
Comments: To be published in Science. 12 pages, 3 figures

The recent discovery of a hyper metal-poor (HMP) star, whose metallicity Fe/H is smaller than 1/100,000 of the solar ratio, together with one earlier HMP star, has raised a challenging question if these HMP stars are the actual first generation, low mass stars in the Universe. We argue that these HMP stars are the second generation stars being formed from gases which were chemically enriched by the first generation supernovae. The key to this solution is the very unusual abundance patterns of these HMP stars with important similarities and differences. We can reproduce these abundance features with the core-collapse ``faint'' supernova models which undergo extensive matter mixing and fallback during the explosion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Are these two stars pop 111? the chemical make up is suggestive that they
are, the close binary idea seems less likely to me.
 
wolram said:
Are these two stars pop 111? the chemical make up is suggestive that they
are

Isn't that the opposite of the conclusion reached by the paper? Do you not agree with their findings?
 
Space Tiger

Isn't that the opposite of the conclusion reached by the paper? Do you not agree with their findings?

Im not sure what their findings are, it always seems that more than one
possibility exists, and the most intuitive is always the one that is over ridden?
 
wolram said:
Im not sure what their findings are

It says in the abstract you posted. They find that the abundances are consistent with supernova enrichment (i.e. not Pop III).
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top