1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Hyper-Velocity Stars

  1. Jan 27, 2006 #1

    Garth

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Probing the Shape of the Galactic Halo with Hyper-Velocity Stars
    Do they need a SMBH to sling shot them or would smaller masses do?

    Garth
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 27, 2006 #2

    George Jones

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    At first, I didn't understand your acronym - I could only come with solar for S, and I knew you didn't mean this. Then the lightbulb went on.

    In any case, the authors seem to feel that a supermassive black hole is necessary, as indicated by their second paragraph.

    Regards,
    George
     
  4. Jan 28, 2006 #3

    Garth

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Well, that paper is suggesting that the hyervelocity stars have to be ejected from close binaries disrupted by a SMBH.

    The velocity of such stars are ~ 600 km.sec-1 whereas typical galactic orbital velocities < 300 km.sec-1, so they are travelling at twice this rate. That paper refers to one star with a velocity in galactic coordinates of +853 ± 12 km.sec-1, which is, at its location, twice the velocity of escape from the galaxy.

    Now they say for a star to retain an escaped velocity of this magnitude the initial velocity of ejection must be > 1000 km.sec-1, which is derived from the Kelperian escape velocity of
    [itex]v[/itex] ≈ [tex]\sqrt {\frac{2GM_{BH}}{r}}[/tex] > 1000 km.sec-1

    As G ~ 7 x 10-8 c.g.s units and they suggest
    r < 0.01 parsec ~ 3 x 1016 cms. and as
    1000 km.sec-1 is 108 cm.sec-1 and MSolar ~ 2 x 1033 gms.


    then MBH ~ 1016[tex]\frac{r}{2G}[/tex] ~ 106MSolar .

    However r ~ 0.01 parsec ~ 103 AU and a BH could approach much closer than that.

    If the binary system were approached to 1 AU then the BH would only have to have a mass of 103MSolar.

    In other words an IMBH would do, rather than a SMBH, and there may be many more of them. :wink:

    Garth
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2006
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Hyper-Velocity Stars
  1. No star (Replies: 1)

Loading...