Solving Hyperbolic Equations Using Exponential Definitions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the equation tanh(x) + sinh(x) = 3 using exponential definitions of hyperbolic functions. The original poster, Oscar, attempts to manipulate the equation but struggles to find an exact solution, ultimately converting it into a polynomial form. Other participants suggest using hyperbolic identities to simplify the problem, leading to a new equation: 3t^4 + 4t - 3 = 0. While this approach yields a numerical solution for t, it confirms that an exact solution is elusive. The consensus is that numerical methods may be the best route for finding solutions to such hyperbolic equations.
2^Oscar
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I was doing some work on hyperbolic functions and teaching myself to solve some equations. One of the questions in the book really has me stumped:

Express using exponential definitions of cosh(x) and sinh(x) find the exact solution of:
tanh(x) + sinh(x) = 3

I had a go at solving it and this is how far I got:

2tanh(x) + 2sinh(x) = 6

2(e2x -1)/(e2x -1) + ex - e-x = 6

e3x - 4e2x - 8 - e-x = 0

e4x - 4e3x - 8ex - 1 = 0


then if y=ex

y4 - 4y3 - 8y -1 = 0


After this I get stuck. I can't find any factors in order to solve it using factor theorem so I'm guessing I'm going to get some weird solutions - but the question asks specifically for exact answers?

Would anyone mind please helping me out? (I really hope I haven't made some pathetic little mistake but I really can't see anything...)


Thanks in advance,
Oscar
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your working looks correct and a numerical solution would be easy enough but yeah I can't see any way to get an "exact" solution here either.

Here's another approach which you may find useful (btw it leads to a slightly simpler equation but still no "exact" solution that I can see - though maybe someone else will).

Just about every trig identity for standard trig functions has a counterpart for the hyperbolic trig's. In this case it's the hyperbolic counterpart of the t=tan(x/2) identities that are useful. These identies are :

t = \tanh(x/2)

\tanh(x) = 2t/(1+t^2)

\sinh(x) = 2t/(1-t^2)

\cosh(t) = (1+t^2)/(1-t^2)

Using the identities for tanh and sinh above in your equation it's pretty easy to obtain :

3t^4 + 4t - 3 = 0

Numerically t = 0.63106 and x = 2 \tanh^{-1}(t) = 1.4863 to 5 sig figures. This solution also works in your equation (and of course in the original hyperbolic equation) so we can safely assume it is "correct" - though unfortunately just a numerical solution.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top