Hypothetical kinetics questions, just for fun

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of Spider-Man swinging towards a taller building using a non-elastic web. It explores the dynamics of maintaining a perfectly horizontal path while accounting for gravitational forces and the tension in the web. The analysis reveals that the force Spider-Man needs to exert changes based on his position and the angle of elevation, leading to a complex equation involving tension and gravitational forces. The conversation also touches on the need for calculus to derive the necessary force and the rate at which Spider-Man must retract his web to achieve this motion. Overall, the thread delves into the physics of pendulum motion and the intricacies of force dynamics in this imaginative scenario.
Onus14
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Some imagination is required, so let me dress up the question a bit.

Imagine Spider-Man is on a rooftop, and he shoots a web to the top edge of a nearby building that's taller than the one he's on, in an attempt to swing toward it. Assume that the web is non-elastic and is completely adhered to the face of the building, and if he jumps off the rooftop he will naturally move in a perfect pendulum motion (ignore air resistance) A. His goal, however, is to move toward his target building following a path that is perfectly horizontal to the ground (ignore his reason) B. Keep in mind that he is able to produce a force that draws the web back into his hand, thus giving him the ability to pull himself upward if the end of the web is already attached to a surface.

http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/5889/physics.jpg"

So my question is, how much force will he need to produce from his web-hand in order to maintain the perfect horizontal path? I posit that the force will need to be dynamic/changing at each point of the fall, but can the amount of force necessary to maintain the horizontal path be elegantly described in an equation that accounts for all the variables (like building distance, time taken to travel, etc)? I gave up trying once I guessed that calculus would be involved...

If anyone is up for solving this, go for it; I'd be very interested in the solution and your thought process.


Good to be here,
~ Onus
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome Onus.

Onus14 said:
Imagine Spider-Man is on a rooftop, and he shoots a web to the top edge of a nearby building that's taller than the one he's on, in an attempt to swing toward it. Assume that the web is non-elastic and is completely adhered to the face of the building, and if he jumps off the rooftop he will naturally move in a perfect pendulum motion (ignore air resistance) A.

It won't be a pendulum motion (unless the strand is attached right ahead & he swings forthright). It will be a superposition of two pendulum motions ;a non-planar trajectory.
If you want the strand to be of constant length , a horizontal path is impossible to maintain. If you allow elasticity, a horizontal path is possible. The calculation is not really something to funk at .
Consider the horizontal plane in which the path lies.Assuming that the strand is taut all the times , the tension T points towards the fixed point of adherence of the strand.
The vertical component of the tension must be mg = T sin a (m =mass of the spider & a is the angle of elevation of the fixed point from his current position).Now, the magnitude of the acceleration must be (T/m)cos a . Use polar coordinates & a simple differential equation follows.
 
In a regular pendulum motion(the A path), the tension in the web would depend on the angle of elevation at that point in time. So you end up with T = W sin(a), where T is the tension and W is the weight of spiderman, a is angle of elevation.

Now to travel in a straight path(B path), the total net force vertically must be equal to zero. So we consider all the forces acting vertically, W, and the new tension since spiderman is pulling downwards, the new tension is greater than before(Newton's 3rd law and all), let's call it T'.

Now what's the value to T'? We know T' would simply be the old tension, + the added force which spiderman pulls down with, causing the web to pull back with a greater amount as well. So T' = T + F where F is the force which spiderman uses to retract his web.

Now we have the vertical components which must equal to zero.
So W - T' sin(a) = 0,
=> W - T sin(a) - F sin (a) = 0
=> W - W sin^2(a) - F sin(a) = 0
=> F = W(1 - sin^2(a))/sin(a)
F = W cos^2(a)/sin(a)

So we have the force he must pull his web in at any angle a. Now how do we find a in terms of t(time)? We have to consider the horizontal forces. Now the net horizontal force would be equal to T' cos(a) = F cos(a) + T cos(a).

Now letting the horizontal distance of spiderman from the taller building be x, the difference in height be h, we can find cos(a) in terms of h and x.

Using Pythagoras's Theorem, we find cos(a) = d/root(d^2+h^2), sin(a) = h/root(d^2+h^2)

Substituting all this into the net force yields ma = W(x^3+hx)/(hx^2+h^3) which simplifies to:
d2x/dt^2 = g(x^3+hx)/(hx^2+h^3), where g = 9.81, the acceleration due to Earth's gravity at the surface, a rather evil looking second order differential equation.
Solve it for x in terms of t, plug it into F and you get F in terms of t, h and x.

Oh yes another question you might want to consider is how much length of web must spiderman retract per second to obtain this motion, that is, the rate at which web is retracted.
 
Thanks heaps, Repainted, for your easy-to-follow solution. :))
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top