I badly in yet another uniform convergence problem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
end3r7
Messages
168
Reaction score
0
I hate, HATE uniform convergence for series... hate this, really do. I'm trying hard, but our prof gives us very difficult borderline problems.

Now, I am almost 100% sure this is not uniformly convergence at x=1, but since it's a stinking series, it's hard to figure out it's summation

Homework Statement


data[/b]
1) Test the following series for Uniform Convergence on [0,1]
[tex] (1-x)\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\inf } {\frac{x^n}{1+x^n}} [/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly have not a clue where to start. I want to try the following, and I don't know if it's true.

[tex] \frac{1}{2} < \frac{1}{1+x^n}[/tex]
for x in [0,1)

So [tex] (1-x)\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\inf } {\frac{x^n}{2}} <<br /> (1-x)\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\inf } {\frac{x^n}{1+x^n}} [/tex]

and for x in [0,1) [tex] (1-x)\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\inf } {\frac{x^n}{2}} = \frac{1}{2} [/tex]

and we know that and for x = 0 [tex] (1-x)\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\inf } {\frac{x^n}{1+x^n}} = 0 [/tex]

Thus the limit function is not continuous, so it can't be uniformly convergent.

Sound proof or bad proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar987 said:
The idea was good, but you assumed that

[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}x^n = \frac{1}{1-x}[/tex]

while actually this is true if the index starts at n=0 instead of n=1.

The logic should still work, however, correct? Or is there no fix?
 
Isn't that simply going to come out to x/2 then? So it should still work correct?

(The limit function is not continuous, since it's greater than or equal to 1/2 at 1, and not 0)
 
Last edited: