I cant understand the impulse response in convolution

Jncik
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



i have this graph

[PLAIN]http://img858.imageshack.us/img858/1346/56954457.png

and i need to find h-1[k]

i don't understand, i know that the impulse response is the response for input -> δ[n], in this case it will be δ[n+1], but i don't understand how to calulate the response..
my book doesn't say anything it just has the solution which is the following

[PLAIN]http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/7766/61813044.png

can you show me how he figured this out?? you d save my life
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're leaving out some context, so I'm going to make a few educated guesses.

I suspect we're talking about some signal that is passed through a filter, which would yield an output signal.

In this case the input signal would be modeled with x[n].
The filter would be modeled with h[n].
And you would have an unmentioned output signal that we'll call y[k].

The correlation would then be given by the following equation:
10ff3eff0b11291928b4035623b1a2f9.png


Basically, what I'm trying to say, based on my series of assumptions, is that h[n] is not calculated here, but given, to be used in a later step.

Do any of my assumptions and my tentative conclusion come near the reality?
 
yes they do, thank you very much, i just wasnt sure that he gave us this to find out the y[n]
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top