I fail to see how two counterrotating gyroscopes behave

  • Thread starter Thread starter farolero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gyroscopes
AI Thread Summary
Two counter-rotating gyroscopes do not provide resistance to spin, effectively behaving as if they are not spinning. However, when arranged in a V shape, they create resistance in all axes of space due to their net angular momentum. An astronaut holding these gyros and adjusting their arm position can experience changes in spin direction to conserve momentum. The discussion highlights that the angular momentum of the gyros can be analyzed as vectors, leading to different behaviors based on their arrangement. Ultimately, the original assumption about the behavior of V-shaped gyros was corrected, acknowledging that they can still spin along one axis.
farolero
Messages
166
Reaction score
10
so my assumption is that 2 counterotating gyros offer nor resistance to spin, its like they were not spinning

but two counter rotating gyros set in a V shape will offer resistance in all axes of space

so an astronaut in space has the arm aiming up and in each hand he has two counterotating gyros

net momentum is zero

now the astronaut puts his arms in cross and now the gyros are spinning in the same sense so to keep the conservation of momentum the astronaut begins to spin in opposite sense

but imagine a mid point the astronaut put the arms in a V shape

now to keep momentum he begins to spin vertically

but then what happened with the V shape two gyros resistance to spin since the astronaut is spinning with them

anybody know what would be going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
farolero said:
so my assumption is that 2 counterotating gyros offer nor resistance to spin, its like they were not spinning

but two counter rotating gyros set in a V shape will offer resistance in all axes of space
Examine that assumption for a moment. Two rotating gyros set in a V shape will have a net angular momentum, yes? This angular momentum will have an associated direction, yes? If the frame on which the two gyros are mounted is subject to a torque about an axis aligned in that direction, would you expect to see any precession?
 
well but once the gyros have the V shape no more force is acting upon them, you could even set them free from each other and theyll keep that V position
 
farolero said:
anybody know what would be going on here?
Angular momentum is a vector. Add the vectors of the counter rotating gyros to get the total angular momentum vector.

For another example, see below video for co-rotating gyros on a counter rotating V. The total angular momentum here happens to be zero:

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes nsaspook and farolero
i see thanks a lot i see my original assumption was wrong, two V gyros still can spin in one axe of space
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top