I found a really weird function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chuckstabler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Weird
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a user discovering a function related to the derivative of the square root of 4x^2 + 4, which resembles a normal distribution. The derivative simplifies to (4/(sqrt(4x^2+4)) - (16x^2/sqrt(4x^2+4)^3/2). Another participant explains that the function can be simplified to (x^2+1)^{-\frac{3}{2}} and notes that while it looks similar to a normal distribution on a linear plot, its tail behavior differs significantly. They also mention that the function's second derivative relates closely to a normal probability density function, providing insight into the observed similarities. The conversation highlights the mathematical properties that contribute to the function's appearance.
Chuckstabler
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Hey all, so I don't even know how I managed to find this, So I'll walk you all through how I've spent my last couple hours.

I've been studying intro calculus, and I recently came across the chain rule. I was screwing around with finding the derivative of various functions like the square-root of 4x^2 + 4. I then took the derivative of square-root 4x^2 + 4 (I think that's the function I took, I screwed up somewhere, but oh well, it doesn't change the function that I found), and found it's derivative using the quotient rule, and after simplifying I was left with

(4/(sqrt(4x^2+4)) - (16x^2/sqrt(4x^2+4)^3/2)

You can find it on at this link: (It's a graphing calculator website), https://www.desmos.com/calculator/l68uv67zay

It looks remarkably similar to a normal distribution, and seems to exhibit some properties of a normal distribution, is it doing this for any particular reason?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why don't you reduce it to a common denominator and also factor out √4 from within the radical? What are you left with then?

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Give me a bit, i'll work on it. Thanks for your comment :D
 
upload_2015-5-4_22-7-25.png
 
Your function can be simplified to$$(x^2+1)^{-\frac{3}{2}}$$
Functions like this don't look completely different from a normal distribution on a linear plot, but they have a completely different shape in the tails.
 
  • Like
Likes suremarc
Your function has second derivative ##f''(x)=\frac{-3x}{(x^2+1)^{5/2}}##, which is approximately equal to ##-3xf(x)## when ##x## is small.
The function ##g(x)=e^{-\frac{3x^2}{2}}## has derivative ##-3xg(x)##, and furthermore ##f'(0)=g(0)=1##; so ##g## can be said to approximate ##f'## near ##0##. Coincidentally ##g## describes a normal PDF, so that explains why your function looks like a normal distribution. I would link a graph comparing the two (they are very close!) but I happen to be posting from my phone presently.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top