I have a problem figuring this out

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonRox
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying a formula from Special Relativity, specifically the equation for time dilation. The original equation is transformed into an approximate form using the binomial expansion for small values of beta. The simplification results in the expression Δt ≈ (ℓ/2c) β². The participant emphasizes the utility of approximations in physics while cautioning about their limitations. The problem has been resolved, and the method can be applied by substituting x with -β² for easier calculations.
JasonRox
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
4
This is from Special Relativity, but it is not relevant to my question anyways.

I am trying to simplify this:

{\Delta}t = \frac{\ell}{c} \left[ \frac{1}{1- \beta^2} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}} \right]

- TO -

{\Delta}t \approx \frac{\ell}{2c} \beta^2

For small x, (1 + x)^n \approx 1 + n x

NOTE: Problem SOLVED. Feel free to try this out yourself. Make x = -\beta^2, it makes it easier, or I think it does.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yep, It's called using the first two terms of the binomial expansion and it comes in very handy. :)
 
One has to be careful , though approximations are common [edit]in[/edit]physics ... though it really demands sometimes to think how much approximate approximations should be :P

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BernoulliInequality.html
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top