I have a really important question about physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter ihatecats2014
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Important Physics
AI Thread Summary
A freshman expresses a strong interest in physics, noting that while they excel in math, they struggle with the time it takes to solve kinematic equations in physics. They seek advice on improving problem-solving speed and efficiency. Responses emphasize that improvement comes with practice and a deep understanding of the material, rather than shortcuts. It's highlighted that university-level physics and math require different thinking compared to high school, and that speed is less critical than accuracy in real-world applications. The discussion underscores the importance of grasping the underlying principles of physics to enhance problem-solving skills, suggesting that thorough understanding will lead to quicker solutions over time.
ihatecats2014
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
hi, i am a freshman and i really enjoy physics. With other homework like programming, biology, or english (i hate english) i seem to be aware of the time spent doing the problems and studying from the textbook, but when i do physics i loose track of time and i really enjoy it. I am pretty good at math, but for some reason it takes me a really long time to solve simple kinematic equations.

i usually will get the right answer; it just takes to long for my liking and it would be a huge detriment when taking a quiz or a test. What can i do to improve my problem solving ability in physics. In regards to getting a problem right away. (just taking your standard intro course for majors in physics currently). Does it just come with doing a lot of problems? or do you have any tips i could do to improve in physics.

With math, i got a 5 on my ap calc ab test, and i scored a perfect on my math placement test. What i noticed is, (somewhat disconcerting) is that i am good at math because i know how to mechanically solve problems. When i took a quick peek at spivak i noticed that i was not very good at proofs. But if you give me a really hard derivative problem, i'll recognize the mechanical steps needed to solve it but i won't actually know why the answer is the answer. I think that is the reason why physics is a bit tough for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether you hate English or not, it will make a big difference for your career (academic or otherwise). For better or worse, successful proposal writing as well as papers for publication require clarity, if nothing else.
 
Just practice, practice, practice.


ihatecats2014 said:
Does it just come with doing a lot of problems?

Yes.
 
Understand the derivations of the equations and theorems you use. These show you why and how it works. You can find these in the text, online, or from your instructor.

You become faster by understanding the material better; not by taking shortcuts.
 
Practice alot. Solve a lot of problems. You will get quicker and better at it with time.

Remember problems in math and physics that you will get in university courses will require a different way of thinking than most math and physics you did in high school. Even if your good at math, you may still struggle as you get used to university level work.

This will be even more true when you get into upper level physics courses and proof based math courses.
 
ihatecats2014 said:
I am pretty good at math, but for some reason it takes me a really long time to solve simple kinematic equations.

i usually will get the right answer; it just takes to long for my liking and it would be a huge detriment when taking a quiz or a test.

I don't want to take away from your good question because you are wise to try to improve your speed and skills, and it is not unreasonable to want to do well on tests.

However, thinking long term, being able to solve problems and to get the right answer is more important than speed in the real world. The idea that a problem needs to be solved in 15 minutes (as in a test situation) is not relevant to the real world. Real-world problems take days, weeks, months and sometimes even years to solve. Even homework level problems, that may take an hour, are just practice, albeit good and useful practice.

Personally, I was very fast at solving problems back in school and typically did well on tests, sometimes flying by the seat of my pants, with less than optimal study-time. I have now completely lost this ability (due to age and lack of need) and I don't miss it at all. When I first started working on real problems I would miss too much by not thinking all possibilities through. Now I take my time, and ironically the full problem solving process takes less overall time because no time is wasted backtracking because of oversights. You see, the real world is much more complex than the very contrived problems we are given in school.
 
Last edited:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
60
Views
6K
Replies
32
Views
395
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top