I have no idea why this is an enantiomer

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nick tringali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea No idea
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of enantiomers, specifically addressing the confusion surrounding their structural differences. One participant emphasizes the importance of using molecular modeling tools to better understand stereoisomers in three dimensions. The key point made is that enantiomers, while appearing similar, cannot be superimposed on one another due to their distinct spatial arrangements. The explanation highlights that flipping the molecule involves more than just rotating it; it requires considering the orientation of functional groups, such as hydroxyls, which change position relative to the viewer. This spatial distinction is what defines them as enantiomers, underscoring the necessity of visualizing molecular structures to grasp their differences fully.
Nick tringali
Messages
71
Reaction score
13
image.jpg
I literally cannot conceptualize why this is an enantiomer. They are literally the exact same thing.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Get a hold of a good molecular modeling kit or a visualization program (there are a few good free ones online). It’s a lot easier to wrap your head around stereoisomers when you can play with the 3D representations of molecules.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
Nick tringali said:
View attachment 284490I literally cannot conceptualize why this is an enantiomer. They are literally the exact same thing.
No, they are not.
Even without getting a model - how can you flip them around one into another?
You cannot rotate it around horizontal axis - because this would flip the M-shaped carbon backbone into W. So the rotation which leaves the pentane backbone unchanged M would be the rotation around vertical axis.
But what happens to the hydroxyls then?
The upper form starts off having the left, say 2 hydroxyl group towards viewer and the right, then 4 hydroxyl group away from viewer.
When you flip the sheet, the 2-hydroxyl group will be on the right... but because you are now looking at it from the opposite side of sheet, it is now away from you. So you again have the left hydroxyl (now 4) towards you and the right hydroxyl away from you. The molecule is NOT converted to the form below where the left hydroxyl is away from you and right hydroxyl towards you.
Which is why they are enantiomers.
 
When you flip these mentally, you have to think of it as you are flipping a page of a book, not simply interchange the groups.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top