I have no idea why this is an enantiomer

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nick tringali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea No idea
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of enantiomers in stereochemistry, specifically addressing the confusion some participants have regarding the structural differences that define enantiomers. The scope includes conceptual clarification and technical reasoning related to molecular structures.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in understanding why two molecules are considered enantiomers, stating they appear identical.
  • Another participant suggests using a molecular modeling kit or visualization program to better grasp the concept of stereoisomers through 3D representations.
  • A different participant elaborates on the structural differences, explaining that flipping the molecule involves specific rotations that do not yield the same configuration, thus supporting the claim that they are indeed enantiomers.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of visualizing the flipping process as akin to flipping a page in a book, rather than merely interchanging groups, to understand the stereochemical implications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there is a clear disagreement regarding the conceptualization of enantiomers, with some expressing confusion and others providing explanations that challenge that confusion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding stereochemistry, particularly in visualizing molecular structures and the implications of flipping configurations. There are unresolved assumptions about the participants' familiarity with molecular modeling tools and stereochemical principles.

Nick tringali
Messages
71
Reaction score
13
image.jpg
I literally cannot conceptualize why this is an enantiomer. They are literally the exact same thing.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Get a hold of a good molecular modeling kit or a visualization program (there are a few good free ones online). It’s a lot easier to wrap your head around stereoisomers when you can play with the 3D representations of molecules.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
Nick tringali said:
View attachment 284490I literally cannot conceptualize why this is an enantiomer. They are literally the exact same thing.
No, they are not.
Even without getting a model - how can you flip them around one into another?
You cannot rotate it around horizontal axis - because this would flip the M-shaped carbon backbone into W. So the rotation which leaves the pentane backbone unchanged M would be the rotation around vertical axis.
But what happens to the hydroxyls then?
The upper form starts off having the left, say 2 hydroxyl group towards viewer and the right, then 4 hydroxyl group away from viewer.
When you flip the sheet, the 2-hydroxyl group will be on the right... but because you are now looking at it from the opposite side of sheet, it is now away from you. So you again have the left hydroxyl (now 4) towards you and the right hydroxyl away from you. The molecule is NOT converted to the form below where the left hydroxyl is away from you and right hydroxyl towards you.
Which is why they are enantiomers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
When you flip these mentally, you have to think of it as you are flipping a page of a book, not simply interchange the groups.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
23K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K