A I have some naive questions about Reeh-Schlieder-theorem

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter antaris
  • Start date Start date
antaris
Messages
8
Reaction score
3
Hello,

do local operator algebras only matter when you’re constructing a QFT or making approximations? In Witten’s paper (arXiv:1803.04993), he argues quite the opposite: the full Hilbert space H cannot be factorized into H_V ⊗ H_V′, since that would imply the vacuum splits into unentangled regions, contradicting the universal UV divergence of entanglement entropy. From his argument I understand that every short‑distance (“UV”) state looks like the vacuum at small scales—an important point when thinking about UV fixed points.

Edward Witten arXiv:1803.04993:
The Reeh-Schlieder theorem says that, in quantum field theory, if AV and AV′ are the algebras
of operators supported in complementary regions of spacetime, then similarly the vacuum is a cyclic separating vector for this pair of algebras.8 This might make one suspect that the Hilbert space H should be factored as H = HV ⊗ HV′ , with the vacuum being a fully entangled vector in the sense that the coefficients analogous to ck are all nonzero. This is technically not correct. If it were correct, then picking ψ ∈ HV , χ ∈ HV′ , we would get a vector ψ ⊗ χ ∈ H with no entanglement between observables in V and those in V′. This is not what happens in quantum field theory.

In quantum field theory, the entanglement entropy between adjacent regions has a universal ultraviolet divergence, independent of the states considered. The leading ultraviolet divergence is the same in any state as it is in the vacuum, because every state looks like the vacuum at short distances. The universality of this ultraviolet divergence means that it reflects not a property of any particular state but rather the fact that H cannot be factored as HV ⊗ HV′ .

Have I misunderstood something?

More precisely: if one wants to describe IR and UV effects on all scales within a single model, must one turn to algebraic QFT (AQFT), because in standard QFT there is no single, global Fock space? The usual Fock‑space decomposition is an excellent approximation only for the free (non‑interacting) vacuum—once interactions in a realistic model cannot be neglected, that decomposition fails? Does this mean we cannot build a fully realistic QFT by “gluing together” simpler pieces of theories?

Thanks in advance.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top