MHB I have the data and need to make a prediction based on it (probability)

chriskeller1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone,
I really can't understand stats and it's driving me crazy.

I have data for births linked with different years, the graphic looks like this
View attachment 3382
But I need to make a prediction on the births in year 2010. How do I go about that?!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-10-08 at 9.39.48 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-10-08 at 9.39.48 PM.png
    4.2 KB · Views: 77
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It looks like you are provided with the linear regression:

$$y=-0.1103x+234.98$$

Can you see what you need to use for $x$ to get a prediction for the year 2010?
 
I'm confused... Isn't x supposed to represent the years?
 
chriskeller1 said:
I'm confused... Isn't x supposed to represent the years?

Yes, it appears to me that the independent variable $x$ is the year, and this input into the given line will give a prediction for the output, the dependent variable which is the birth rate, for that year.

So, use $x=2010$ in the given line, and what do you find?
 
Oh, so basically it's going to be 13.277?

Thank you!
 
chriskeller1 said:
Oh, so basically it's going to be 13.277?

Thank you!

Yes, that's the same value I get. (Yes)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top