I have.Voting for PF in SciAm's Top 50 Science Websites?Have you voted yet?

[quantumdude]

Have you voted for PF to be in Scientific American's Top 50 Science Websites?

I have.

Cast yer vote here: editors@sciam.com

 

[FZ+]

Yeah... done.

 

[Kerrie]

sure did, and emailed all my friends and family to vote too

 

[Galaphile]

Yep, I voted!

galaphile

 

[GENIERE]

Yep!

 

[MSI]

well i don't know what to write ...
if they watch my messege they will make PF down (you know my weak english)

 

[Mentat]

Originally posted by MSI
well i don't know what to write ...
if they watch my messege they will make PF down (you know my weak english)

I voted a while back. When do they announce the winners?

 

[Bystander]

Originally posted by Tom
Have you voted for PF to be in Scientific American's Top 50 Science Websites?

I have.

Cast yer vote here: editors@sciam.com

Let's see --- Tom's logic notes, Tom's QFT --- worth following; and, what else?

Honest vote? No.

Room for improvement? Yes.

Gettin' there? Yes.

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

Bystander, name 50 Science Websites that are better than PP anf PF.

Thanks to everyone who have voted!

 

[Bystander]

Originally posted by Greg Bernhardt
Bystander, name 50 Science Websites that are better than PP anf PF.

Thanks to everyone who have voted!

50?! Aw, c'mon, Greg --- SciAm lists only 5 in each category. The point I was making is that comparing canned content sites (SciAm's list) to fora, bulletin boards, usenet groups, etc. is very much like comparing apples to oranges --- the signal:noise aspects are entirely different.

There's good stuff shows up on PF: Siv's post on "(The) Sagan Baloney Detection Kit;" Tom's logic notes; Tom's QFT thread; ta-da, ta-da, ta-da. Where do I spend my time? On PF. Where do I go for solid information? Yahoo or Google. Compare the content of "How do bullets fly?" http://www.nennstiel-ruprecht.de/bullfly/ to that of the PF thread "Spin stabilized." Forum vs. canned content. Free-for-all vs. "formal" presentations.

I wouldn't get too involved in a SciAm PR game --- what you've got going has its own potential to become something entirely different from the things they've noticed and are trying to rate.