How Can You Explore Solutions for ln() with Negative Values?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alkatran
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the natural logarithm function, ln(x), is only defined for positive values. It highlights the misconception that ln(x)^-1 equals ln(-x), correcting it to state that ln(-x) actually equals ln(-1) + ln(x). The conversation emphasizes that while complex solutions exist for ln(-x), there are no real solutions. Participants acknowledge the confusion surrounding the relationship between negative values and logarithmic functions. Understanding these properties is crucial for accurately exploring solutions involving ln() with negative inputs.
Alkatran
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
959
Reaction score
0
1/ln(x) = ln(x)^-1 = ln(-x)
ln(-e) = 1/ln(e) = 1/1 = 1

ln() is only defined over positive values, but you can find solutions like so... where's the error.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ln(x)^-1 = ln(-x) is incorrect. You're probably thinking of ln (1/x) = - ln (x)
 
Your trouble is that

\ln (-x) \ne (\ln(x))^{-1})
This is the correct way to do it.
\ln (-x) = \ln(-1 * x) = \ln(-1) + \ln(x)


There will be complex solutions to this but none on the Real line.
 
Thanks, I knew something wasn't right. I should caught on when -x = 1/x :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top