I know that 1^(+/- infinity) is indeterminate.Is c^(+/- infinity)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noxide
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity
Noxide
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
I know that 1^(+/- infinity) is indeterminate.
Is c^(+/- infinity) indeterminate for real numbers c?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Why do you say that 1^\infty and 1^{-\infty} are indeterminate? We have

\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} 1^n = 1

and

\lim_{n \rightarrow -\infty} 1^n = 1

If c > 1, then

\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} c^n = \infty

and

\lim_{n \rightarrow -\infty} c^n = 0

and the opposite result holds for 0 < c < 1

One of the limits doesn't exist if c < -1, and the other one doesn't exist if -1 < c < 0. Neither limit exists if c = -1. (I'll let you work out the details.)
 


Think about this in terms of limits. Do you have a feel for what the values of these limits are?
\lim_{n \to \infty} 2^n
\lim_{n \to \infty} 2^{-n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{2^n}

To investigate this further for arbitrary bases, you probably want to limit the base to the positive reals. One case would be for a > 1. Another would be for 0 < a < 1.
 


jbunniii said:
Why do you say that 1^\infty and 1^{-\infty} are indeterminate? We have

\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} 1^n = 1
One of the indeterminate forms is [1^{\infty}]. An example of this is \lim_{x \to 0} (1 + x)^{1/x}.

Here we have the base approaching 1 and the exponent growing large without bound, yet the limit is not 1.
jbunniii said:
and

\lim_{n \rightarrow -\infty} 1^n = 1

If c &gt; 1, then

\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} c^n = \infty

and

\lim_{n \rightarrow -\infty} c^n = 0

and the opposite result holds for 0 &lt; c &lt; 1

The limits don't exist if c \leq -1, and they do exist if -1 &lt; c &lt; 0. (I'll let you work out the details.)
 


Mark44 said:
Think about this in terms of limits. Do you have a feel for what the values of these limits are?
\lim_{n \to \infty} 2^n
\lim_{n \to \infty} 2^{-n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{2^n}

To investigate this further for arbitrary bases, you probably want to limit the base to the positive reals. One case would be for a > 1. Another would be for 0 < a < 1.

Heh. Gotcha, thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top