I need somebody to double check my work I think my math is wrong somewhere

  • Thread starter Thread starter soundengineer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Check my work Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the calculations in a spreadsheet designed to convert vehicle data into a horsepower chart, resembling a street dyno. The user reports that their calculated horsepower is approximately 25% higher than the expected value of 447 horsepower and 396 torque. There is a mention of including a dyno correction factor for SAE values, but confusion arises regarding the units used for torque and angular speed. The importance of using consistent units, such as foot-pounds for torque and radians per second for angular speed, is emphasized to ensure accurate calculations. The user seeks assistance to identify and correct the discrepancies in their math.
soundengineer
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I need somebody to double check my work...I think my math is wrong somewhere..

so I've been working on a spreadsheet to take some data from a vehicle's data port...
and to transfer it into a Horsepower chart...
basically making a street Dyno...

I've gotten everything to work together...including graphing
but I know that my math has to be wrong somewhere and I need some help to get it right...

I think I've done all the conversions correctly...
I know I've done all the lookup from my data page correctly...

The Data I used is from a vehcile on the dyno...this vehicle made 447HorsePower and 396 Torque
but my excel math seems to say it s a lot higher...a lot higher..my end result is 25% or so higher than what it should be...
I've even added in dyno correction factor that every dynomometer uses to get an SAE corrected valueMy link to my excel spreadsheet...in a zip file...
too big for me to post it...
http://www.audiohelix.com/physics/
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


In a consistent system of units we have:

Power = Torque * (rotational speed)

You stated that your are measuring power in units of horsepower (instead of, for example, watts).

When you say 396 Torque, you are ommiting the units. The most likely possibility in America is foot-lbs, whereas with the metric system torque is measured in Newton-meters.

The metric unit for angular speed is radians per second (not revolutions per second, as engines are often quoted). To convert revolutions per second to radians per second multiply by 2*pi = 6.28.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top