I need to know how to figure this problem out.

  • Thread starter Thread starter HappMatt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a quadratic function problem where f(0)=0, f(1)=2, and f(2)=3, with the goal of finding f(3). The quadratic function can be expressed in the standard form f(x)=ax²+bx+c, leading to three equations to determine the coefficients a, b, and c. Despite using the equation f(x)=(-1/2)x²+(5/2)x, the user mistakenly calculated f(3) as 6 instead of the correct answer, which is 3. The confusion stems from the properties of quadratic functions and the interpretation of the outputs at specific points. Ultimately, the correct calculations confirm that f(3) equals 3, resolving the initial uncertainty.
HappMatt
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Im doing a practice test for a asmaytic(not sure how its spelled) and i have the answer but am just unsure of how i was supposed to figure it out. Alright, here's the problem.

if "f" is a quadriatic function with f(0)=0, f(1)=2, and f(2)=3, then f(3)=?
a.4 b.3 c.13/4 E.4

the answer is supposed to be b. but i have no clue how they got that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: What does it mean that f is "a quadratic function"?
 
well I am not to sure besideds the fact that i think its a parabola
 
No, a parabola is a graph. It is true that the graph of any quadratic function is a parabola. A quadratic function is a function that can be written in the form f(x)= ax2+ bx+ c- that's what you are thinking of. I suspect that any test asking such a question will assume you know more than that! Do you notice there are 3 "unknown" coefficients in that? Putting in the three values given for x and y will give you three equations to solve for a, b, c. Once you know that, you can find f(3).
There are easier ways to do this problem but that is the most straightforward.
 
well I am still working on this, i just got off of work and I am definately getting a litle annoyed since i still can't figure this out. the reson i brought up the fact that's ist a parabola is that from the best of my knowledge a porabola is never a horizontal line such as y=3 yet, if f(2)=3 and f(3)=3 the what we are seeing is a horizonal line and that should be impossible in a quadriatic for many reasons. I did a system of equations and found an equation that works for all given values yet of course when f(3) was entered into the equation its output was 6. I used the equation(-1/2)x^2+(5/2)x+0. As for the test its actually just for extra credit and is different from what i am currently studying in that the test is more algebra based and at my school you have to be in calc 1 or precalc to take it so right now I am actually doing a lot more with dirivatives than i am with algebra, so this stuff isn't exactly the freshish in my head.
 
HappMatt said:
well I am still working on this, i just got off of work and I am definately getting a litle annoyed since i still can't figure this out. the reson i brought up the fact that's ist a parabola is that from the best of my knowledge a porabola is never a horizontal line such as y=3 yet, if f(2)=3 and f(3)=3 the what we are seeing is a horizonal line and that should be impossible in a quadriatic for many reasons. I did a system of equations and found an equation that works for all given values yet of course when f(3) was entered into the equation its output was 6. I used the equation(-1/2)x^2+(5/2)x+0. As for the test its actually just for extra credit and is different from what i am currently studying in that the test is more algebra based and at my school you have to be in calc 1 or precalc to take it so right now I am actually doing a lot more with dirivatives than i am with algebra, so this stuff isn't exactly the freshish in my head.
f(x)= (-1/2)x^2+(5/2)x is, in fact, the correct formula.
f(0)= 0, f(1)= -1/2+ 5/2= 2, f(2)= (-1/2)(4)+ (5/2)(2)= -2+ 5= 3 and
f(3)= (-1/2)(9)+(5/2)(3)= (-9+ 15)/2= 6/2= 3.
Apparently, you simply forgot the "2" in the denominator!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top