I think human population is too much.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chitose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human population
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of human population growth on global environmental issues, particularly climate change. The author argues that the Earth's resources are being overconsumed due to the high human population, which they estimate at 75 billion. They emphasize that humans consume resources at a much higher rate than other species, leading to significant pollution and resource depletion. The author proposes two potential solutions to mitigate environmental degradation: reducing consumption or decreasing the human population through natural means, such as maintaining a higher death rate than birth rate. They express a belief that if these measures are not taken, the future of humanity is bleak, humorously suggesting that aliens might intervene to save the planet. The author also shares their perspective as a novelist, highlighting themes in their sci-fi work where humans learn from their mistakes and implement strict population controls on a new planet.
Chitose
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Hello, Chitose here

this is first time I post 'talk' instead of 'question'

.......

well, you know that world weather these day is gone haywire.
so... most of people know what the cause (Global worming, El Niño, bla bla bla)

but what the main root of all this problem?

Here's what I think

as topic says, Human population is too high. 75 billion is too much for earth.
why?
single human consume Earth resource far greater than any single animal. Electricity, food, water, gas, pollution etc...
In short, we eat too much than we should.

Only two way to save the Earth is...
1. Reduce our consumption or...
2. Reduce our number (I didn't mean kill, but keep death rate higher than birth rate for a few hundred years, than keep it balancing)

If we can't do any of it, world will doom for sure, sooner or later. (Alien will came to eliminate human to save the Earth for sure this time 555)

the absolute fact is ... If Nature died so is human but If human died Nature still survive.

I know that all species is also increase in population, but nature have their way to keep it balance, unlike human that deviate form nature.

well, I'm a novelist ... sci-fi that is.

In my novel, human move to another planet and learn the mistake that they did, so human new society create extremely strict law, 'Population birth and death on planet MUST BE EQUAL' to not make burden for planet.
only way too increase human population is onto space, on colony.

in case you ask, Yes, I too willingly not to have a child the rest of my life... but I might abduct some kid :)

............

well, I talk too much.

I say what I want to say now.

see you again when I have another silly question.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Back
Top