What Academic Path Should I Choose for a Career in Renewable Energy?

AI Thread Summary
A high school junior interested in space and renewable energy is exploring academic paths to pursue a career in these fields. The individual is considering a double major in physics and chemistry, followed by a graduate degree in engineering, specifically focusing on mechanical or chemical engineering. Discussions highlight that various majors, including physics, chemistry, mathematics, and engineering, can lead to opportunities in renewable energy. It is suggested that students should take diverse classes in college to discover their interests. While an undergraduate engineering degree may enhance marketability, transitioning from physics to engineering is generally easier than the reverse. Recommendations include pursuing a Bachelor in Physics followed by a Master's in Alternative and Renewable Energy. The importance of balancing learning with practical application is emphasized, encouraging exploration of different fields before making definitive academic choices.
echandler
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
I am a Junior in high school and am just starting the college search. I have always wanted to so something with space, and be an astronaut if I could, but, as astronauts take up such a small percentage of any group of people, I have begun to look for other things. Something that has caught my eye and has really interested me is renewable energy production. The thing is that I don't know what degrees to pursue. What I am thinking right now is to get a double major in physics and chemistry, thereby giving myself a very broad basis and understanding of the world. Then, with respect to my graduate degree, I would funnel into an engineering degree. From reading other posts on physicsforums, it seems that for renewable engineering, the three best engineering degrees are chemical, for biofuels, biomass, and the like; Nuclear, for nuclear fission and fusion; and mechanical, "for everything else," as someone said. I am not terribly interested in the nuclear side of things, so I am dropping that path. So I am left with mechanical or chemical engineering, and I, having only taken AP Chemisty and AP Physics C, don't know enough to say which one I like better (I would like to do both). In conclusion, I am a person who has both sides: I really like to learn stuff and know things, but I also, though I am only in high school and have not been in the field yet, know that I am a producer. The thing I don't know yet is when the wanting to learn too much takes over the practical production side of me. Does trying to get a double major in physics and chemistry, and follow that with a graduate degree in chemical or mechanical engineering, qualify as trying to learn and do too much? If so, what academic path do y'all think I should do? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's a bit too early to be planning out your post graduate work while still in high school.

You can get into renewable energy from any number of different fields. Physics, chemistry, mathematics, mechanical or electrical engineering... any of these would give you good skills. Heck, even biology and computer science might get you there, depending on the specifics.

Take classes in a few different fields when you start college and see what you like best. Even if you don't like any of the sciences, there's room in renewable energy for business and similar fields.

So just relax and explore your options when you get to college.
 


I have 3 questions:

1) What majors are geared toward renewable energy? You've answered that any number of majors would work. I am a math/science person, and I particularly enjoy physics and chemistry.

2) I have thought that I would like to major in physics and/or chemistry and then engineering on grad school, but from other posts on this forum, it sounds like an undergrad engineering degree is preferred and that engineering grads are more marketable. Is this true?

3) With an engineering degree will I gain as much knowledge in chemistry and/or physics (I understand the type of engineering is important to this question) as I would if I had majored in these subjects alone?
 


1.Physics
2.There are many physicists that do engineering work. You could do Engineering Physics if you want a between solution.
3.NO and viceversa, but it is easyer to go from physics to engineering then from engineering to physics.

I suggest go Bachelor in Physics and Masters in Alternative and Renewable energy sources.

I myself am doing a 3 year bachelor in Physics then go straight to 4th year in Engineering Physics, and masters in Interdisciplinary Science: integrated approach to Natural Sciences (Biology, Chemistry and Physics) as a second master I might do Pedagogy; Alternative and Renewable energy sources; Atomic, nuclear and elementary particles interactions, astrophysics and applications; or Earth and Atmospheric Science.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
I have a specialization in condensed matter physics and materials physics, and off-late, I have been seeing a lot of research directions moving towards quantum computing (AMO and non-linear optics) and the huge chunk of quantum materials research (and funding) is dedicated towards QIS and QC research. I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field? I am currently at the stage of a postdoc.
Back
Top