I want to learn general relativity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the prerequisites for learning general relativity, focusing on the necessary mathematical background and resources for study. Participants explore the depth of mathematical understanding required and suggest various books and approaches to learning the theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a rigorous understanding of mathematics is essential for learning general relativity, while others propose that a basic understanding may suffice for grasping the phenomenology of the theory.
  • It is noted that foundational knowledge in algebra, geometry, calculus, linear algebra, and differential equations is necessary, with an emphasis on the importance of differential geometry and topology for a deeper understanding.
  • One participant mentions that a mathematical physicist should have a solid grasp of topology and differential geometry, while a regular physicist might learn these topics from general relativity texts.
  • Several participants recommend specific books, including Dirac's short booklet and Nakahara's text, as resources for learning general relativity and its mathematical foundations.
  • There is a suggestion to search previous threads for additional resources and discussions on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the level of mathematical rigor required to learn general relativity, with some advocating for a comprehensive mathematical background and others suggesting that a more casual approach is possible. No consensus is reached on the necessity of rigorous mathematical understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the variability in individual backgrounds and the potential for different learning paths based on one's goals in studying general relativity.

dumbperson
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
hello,

I would like to learn general relativity.

To understand general relativity, do I need to understand the math on a rigorous level? (the way mathematicians understand the math) . What math do I need?

Can you suggest me some math/general relativity books?

Thanks and sorry if my english is bad!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you will need to study at least several years worth of math, possibly more depending on where you are now. Others here who know more than I do will give you the details, but it has been posted here several times before so I suggest a forum search.
 
It depends on what you mean when you say you want to "learn general relativity". If you want to learn it as a physicist would learn it, you need to learn quite a bit of math, including all the standard mathematics required for other physics topics such as algebra, geometry, single and multi-variable calculus, linear algebra, and differential equations (ordinary differential equations as well as partial differential equations). Beyond the basics, you will also have to have a good grasp of differential geometry, and it would be good to know a little bit of basic topology.

You could just learn what the theory of general relativity is, though, without understanding the math very much. You just wouldn't be able to do any calculations or understand the underlying mathematical structure. But you can learn about the phenomenology of general relativity (e.g. that it predicts black holes, or that it predicts gravitational time dilation) without need for so much math.
 
Matterwave said:
[...]You could just learn what the theory of general relativity is, though, without understanding the math very much. You just wouldn't be able to do any calculations or understand the underlying mathematical structure. But you can learn about the phenomenology of general relativity (e.g. that it predicts black holes, or that it predicts gravitational time dilation) without need for so much math.

And for that the OP can simply read Dirac's <80 page booklet from 1975. :) Dirac, just as other quantum physicists such as Pauli, Weinberg and Feynman, wrote texts on GR without the emphasis on differential geometry.
 
Matterwave said:
It depends on what you mean when you say you want to "learn general relativity". If you want to learn it as a physicist would learn it, you need to learn quite a bit of math, including all the standard mathematics required for other physics topics such as algebra, geometry, single and multi-variable calculus, linear algebra, and differential equations (ordinary differential equations as well as partial differential equations). Beyond the basics, you will also have to have a good grasp of differential geometry, and it would be good to know a little bit of basic topology.

You could just learn what the theory of general relativity is, though, without understanding the math very much. You just wouldn't be able to do any calculations or understand the underlying mathematical structure. But you can learn about the phenomenology of general relativity (e.g. that it predicts black holes, or that it predicts gravitational time dilation) without need for so much math.

I want to learn it as a (mathematical) physicist would learn it. I know all the math you mentioned except differential geometry and topology
 
dumbperson said:
I want to learn it as a (mathematical) physicist would learn it. I know all the math you mentioned except differential geometry and topology

Oomph, if you want to learn it as a mathematical physicist, then you better get a good foundation in topology and differential geometry. A regular physicist would probably be able to get away with just learning these topics from a GR book, since most GR books will not presume a prior knowledge of such topics and go over them a little bit, but a mathematical physicist should learn these topics in some detail so as to better understand the geometrical nature of GR. I think Nakahara is a pretty standard reference for such an endeavor.
 
dumbperson said:
hello,

I would like to learn general relativity.

To understand general relativity, do I need to understand the math on a rigorous level? (the way mathematicians understand the math) . What math do I need?

Can you suggest me some math/general relativity books?

Thanks and sorry if my english is bad!

You do need a practical understanding of the math and physics. Math through vector calculus, linear algebra, and differential equations and physics through mechanics and E & M.

This question also comes up rather often here, so you should do a search back through older threads like:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/recommended-books-on-relativity.770233
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K